A Method for Estimating Maternal and Newborn Lives Saved from Health-related Investments Funded by the UK Government Department for International Development Using the Lives Saved Tool

Overview

Journal BMC Public Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Public Health

Date 2017 Nov 17

PMID 29143632

Citations 1

Authors

Ingrid K Friberg

Angela Baschieri

Jo Abbotts

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: In 2010, the UK Government Department for International Development (DFID) committed through its 'Framework for results for reproductive, maternal and newborn health (RMNH)' to save 50,000 maternal lives and 250,000 newborn lives by 2015. They also committed to monitoring the performance of this portfolio of investments to demonstrate transparency and accountability. Methods currently available to directly measure lives saved are cost-, time-, and labour-intensive. The gold standard for calculating the total number of lives saved would require measuring mortality with large scale population based surveys or annual vital events surveillance. Neither is currently available in all low- and middle-income countries. Estimating the independent effect of DFID support relative to all other effects on health would also be challenging.

Methods: The Lives Saved Tool (LiST) is an evidence based software for modelling the effect of changes in health intervention coverage on reproductive, maternal, newborn and child mortality. A multi-country LiST-based analysis protocol was developed to retrospectively assess the total annual number of maternal and newborn lives saved from DFID aid programming in low- and middle-income countries.

Results: Annual LiST analyses using the latest program data from DFID country offices were conducted between 2013 and 2016, estimating the annual number of maternal and neonatal lives saved across 2010-2015. For each country, independent project results were aggregated into health intervention coverage estimates, with and in the absence of DFID funding. More than 80% of reported projects were suitable for inclusion in the analysis, with 151 projects analysed in the 2016 analysis. Between 2010 and 2014, it is estimated that DFID contributed to saving the lives of 15,000 women in pregnancy and childbirth with health programming and 88,000 with family planning programming. It is estimated that DFID health programming contributed to saving 187,000 newborn lives.

Conclusions: It is feasible to estimate the overall contribution and impact of DFID's investment in RMNH from currently available information on interventions and coverage from individual country offices. This utilization of LiST, with estimated population coverage based on DFID program inputs, can be applied to similar types of datasets to quantify programme impact. The global data were used to estimate DFID's progress against the Framework for results targets to inform future programming. The identified limitations can also be considered to inform future monitoring and evaluation program design and implementation within DFID.

Citing Articles

How is the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) used in the global health community? Results of a mixed-methods LiST user study.

Stegmuller A, Self A, Litvin K, Roberton T BMC Public Health. 2017; 17(Suppl 4):773.

PMID: 29143640 PMC: 5688436. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4750-5.

References

Bhutta Z, Ahmed T, Black R, Cousens S, Dewey K, Giugliani E . What works? Interventions for maternal and child undernutrition and survival. Lancet. 2008; 371(9610):417-40. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61693-6. View

You D, Hug L, Ejdemyr S, Idele P, Hogan D, Mathers C . Global, regional, and national levels and trends in under-5 mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. Lancet. 2015; 386(10010):2275-86. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00120-8. View

Stover J, McKinnon R, Winfrey B . Spectrum: a model platform for linking maternal and child survival interventions with AIDS, family planning and demographic projections. Int J Epidemiol. 2010; 39 Suppl 1:i7-10. PMC: 2845855. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyq016. View

Bryce J, Gilroy K, Jones G, Hazel E, Black R, Victora C . The Accelerated Child Survival and Development programme in west Africa: a retrospective evaluation. Lancet. 2010; 375(9714):572-82. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62060-2. View

Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, Perin J, Rudan I, Lawn J . Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000-13, with projections to inform post-2015 priorities: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet. 2014; 385(9966):430-40. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61698-6. View

Jones G, Steketee R, Black R, Bhutta Z, Morris S . How many child deaths can we prevent this year?. Lancet. 2003; 362(9377):65-71. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13811-1. View

Friberg I, Bhutta Z, Darmstadt G, Bang A, Cousens S, Baqui A . Comparing modelled predictions of neonatal mortality impacts using LiST with observed results of community-based intervention trials in South Asia. Int J Epidemiol. 2010; 39 Suppl 1:i11-20. PMC: 2845856. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyq017. View

Boschi-Pinto C, Young M, Black R . The Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group reviews of the effectiveness of interventions to reduce maternal, neonatal and child mortality. Int J Epidemiol. 2010; 39 Suppl 1:i3-6. PMC: 2845857. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyq018. View

Pattinson R, Kerber K, Buchmann E, Friberg I, Belizan M, Lansky S . Stillbirths: how can health systems deliver for mothers and babies?. Lancet. 2011; 377(9777):1610-23. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62306-9. View

10.

Applegate J, Fischer Walker C, Ambikapathi R, Black R . Systematic review of probiotics for the treatment of community-acquired acute diarrhea in children. BMC Public Health. 2014; 13 Suppl 3:S16. PMC: 3847198. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-S3-S16. View

11.

Friberg I, Walker N . Using the Lives Saved Tool as part of evaluations of community case management programs. J Glob Health. 2014; 4(2):020412. PMC: 4267103. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.04.020412. View

12.

Walker N, Tam Y, Friberg I . Overview of the Lives Saved Tool (LiST). BMC Public Health. 2014; 13 Suppl 3:S1. PMC: 3847271. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-S3-S1. View

13.

Lawn J, Cousens S, Zupan J . 4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why?. Lancet. 2005; 365(9462):891-900. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71048-5. View

14.

Amouzou A, Richard S, Friberg I, Bryce J, Baqui A, El Arifeen S . How well does LiST capture mortality by wealth quintile? A comparison of measured versus modelled mortality rates among children under-five in Bangladesh. Int J Epidemiol. 2010; 39 Suppl 1:i186-92. PMC: 2845873. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyq034. View

15.

Bryce J, Friberg I, Kraushaar D, Nsona H, Afenyadu G, Nare N . LiST as a catalyst in program planning: experiences from Burkina Faso, Ghana and Malawi. Int J Epidemiol. 2010; 39 Suppl 1:i40-7. PMC: 2845859. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyq020. View

16.

Lawn J, Blencowe H, Oza S, You D, Lee A, Waiswa P . Every Newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival. Lancet. 2014; 384(9938):189-205. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60496-7. View

17.

Lawn J, Kinney M, Belizan J, Mason E, McDougall L, Larson J . Born too soon: accelerating actions for prevention and care of 15 million newborns born too soon. Reprod Health. 2014; 10 Suppl 1:S6. PMC: 3828574. DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-S1-S6. View

18.

Garnett G, Cousens S, Hallett T, Steketee R, Walker N . Mathematical models in the evaluation of health programmes. Lancet. 2011; 378(9790):515-25. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61505-X. View

19.

Bhutta Z, Yakoob M, Lawn J, Rizvi A, Friberg I, Weissman E . Stillbirths: what difference can we make and at what cost?. Lancet. 2011; 377(9776):1523-38. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62269-6. View

20.

Bhutta Z, Das J, Rizvi A, Gaffey M, Walker N, Horton S . Evidence-based interventions for improvement of maternal and child nutrition: what can be done and at what cost?. Lancet. 2013; 382(9890):452-477. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60996-4. View