» Articles » PMID: 29142959

Hemodialysis Infection Prevention Protocols Ontario-Shower Technique (HIPPO-ST): A Pilot Randomized Trial

Overview
Journal Kidney Int Rep
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2017 Nov 17
PMID 29142959
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: We developed the Hemodialysis Infection Prevention Protocols Ontario-Shower Technique (HIPPO-ST) to permit hemodialysis (HD) patients with central venous catheters (catheters) to shower without additional infection risk. Our primary objective was to determine the feasibility of conducting a parallel randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the impact of HIPPO-ST on catheter-related bacteremia (CRB) in adult HD patients.

Methods: Adult HD patients using catheters were recruited from 11 HD units. Patients were randomized to receive HIPPO-ST or standard care and were followed up for 6 months. Only CRB-outcome assessors were blinded. For the study to be considered feasible, 4 of 5 feasibility outcomes, each with its own statistical threshold for success, must have been achieved.

Results: A total of 68 patients were randomized (33 HIPPO-ST and 35 control) and were followed up to 6 months. Of 5 measures of feasibility, 4 were achieved: (1) accurate CRB rate documented (threshold: κ level >0.80); (2) 97.8% (279/285) of satellite HD patients with catheters were screened (threshold: >95%); (3) 88% (23/26) in the HIPPO-ST arm were successfully educated by 6 months (threshold: >80%); and (4) 0% (0/29) patients in the control arm were "contaminated," that is, using HIPPO-ST (threshold: <5%). However, only 44.2% (72/163) of eligible patients consented to participate (threshold: >80%). The rate of CRB was similarly low in HIPPO-ST and control groups (0.68 vs. 0.88/1000 catheter days).

Discussion: This HIPPO-ST pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of the larger HIPPO-ST study, especially given the high levels of education success with the HIPPO-ST arm and the low levels of contamination in the control arm.

References
1.
Tonnessen B, Money S . Embracing the fistula first national vascular access improvement initiative. J Vasc Surg. 2005; 42(3):585-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.05.030. View

2.
Lee T, Lok C, Vazquez M, Moist L, Maya I, Mokrzycki M . Minimizing hemodialysis catheter dysfunction: an ounce of prevention. Int J Nephrol. 2012; 2012:170857. PMC: 3299246. DOI: 10.1155/2012/170857. View

3.
Nissenson A, Dylan M, Griffiths R, Yu H, Dean B, Danese M . Clinical and economic outcomes of Staphylococcus aureus septicemia in ESRD patients receiving hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005; 46(2):301-8. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.04.019. View

4.
Evans E, Hain D, Kear T, Dork L, Schrauf C . Hemodialysis catheter outcomes pilot study: no dressing coverage with prescribed showering. Nephrol Nurs J. 2014; 41(1):53-64. View

5.
Manian F . IDSA guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2009; 49(11):1770-1. DOI: 10.1086/648113. View