» Articles » PMID: 29142491

Impact of Remote Ischemic Postconditioning During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Left Ventricular Remodeling After Anterior Wall ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Single-Center Experience

Overview
Journal Int J Angiol
Date 2017 Nov 17
PMID 29142491
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The role of remote ischemic postconditioning (RIPostC) in improving left ventricular (LV) remodeling after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not well established. To determine the efficacy and safety of RIPostC in improving LV remodeling and cardiovascular outcomes after primary PCI for anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Seventy-one patients with anterior STEMI were randomized to primary PCI with RIPostC protocol (  = 36) versus conventional primary PCI (  = 35). Primary outcomes included LV remodeling and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) at 6 month follow-up using transthoracic echocardiography. Secondary outcomes included infarct size, ST-segment resolution (STR) ≥70%, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade, and myocardial blush grade (MBG). Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were also assessed at 6 months. Safety outcome included incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) postprimary PCI. Sixty patients completed the study. At 6 months, there was no significant decrease in the incidence of LV remodeling with RIPostC group (  = 0.42). Similarly, RIPostC failed to show significant improvement in LVEF. However, STR ≥ 70% after primary PCI was achieved more in the RIPostC group (  = 0.04), with a trend toward less AKI in the RIPostC group (  = 0.08). All other secondary end points, including MACEs at 6 months, were similar in both groups. RIPostC might be associated with better STR after reperfusion as well as less incidence of AKI in patients undergoing primary PCI for anterior wall STEMI, indicating potential benefit in those patients. Whether this role can be translated to better outcomes after primary PCI warrants further investigation.

Citing Articles

Effect of perioperative remote ischemic conditioning on myocardial injury in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: protocol of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

Xia L, Yang Q, Jiang L, Zheng Y, Chen L, Lin S Trials. 2025; 26(1):63.

PMID: 39984971 PMC: 11844111. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-025-08744-7.


Reperfusion Injury: How Can We Reduce It by Pre-, Per-, and Postconditioning.

Buske M, Desch S, Heusch G, Rassaf T, Eitel I, Thiele H J Clin Med. 2024; 13(1).

PMID: 38202166 PMC: 10779793. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010159.


Effect of remote ischaemic conditioning on infarct size and remodelling in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: the CONDI-2/ERIC-PPCI CMR substudy.

Francis R, Chong J, Ramlall M, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Clayton T, Dodd M Basic Res Cardiol. 2021; 116(1):59.

PMID: 34648075 PMC: 8516772. DOI: 10.1007/s00395-021-00896-2.


Comparison of infarction size, complete ST-segment resolution incidence, mortality and re-infarction and target vessel revascularization between remote ischemic conditioning and ischemic postconditioning in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction....

Zhang H, Yang L, Wang L Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2021; 16(3):278-286.

PMID: 33597992 PMC: 7863805. DOI: 10.5114/aic.2020.99262.


Vascular conditioning prevents adverse left ventricular remodelling after acute myocardial infarction: a randomised remote conditioning study.

Ikonomidis I, Vlastos D, Andreadou I, Gazouli M, Efentakis P, Varoudi M Basic Res Cardiol. 2021; 116(1):9.

PMID: 33547969 DOI: 10.1007/s00395-021-00851-1.


References
1.
Carrick D, Haig C, Rauhalammi S, Ahmed N, Mordi I, McEntegart M . Pathophysiology of LV Remodeling in Survivors of STEMI: Inflammation, Remote Myocardium, and Prognosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 8(7):779-89. PMC: 4509710. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.03.007. View

2.
Schroder R . Prognostic impact of early ST-segment resolution in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2004; 110(21):e506-10. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000147778.05979.E6. View

3.
Botker H, Kharbanda R, Schmidt M, Bottcher M, Kaltoft A, Terkelsen C . Remote ischaemic conditioning before hospital admission, as a complement to angioplasty, and effect on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010; 375(9716):727-34. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62001-8. View

4.
Zatta A, Kin H, Lee G, Wang N, Jiang R, Lust R . Infarct-sparing effect of myocardial postconditioning is dependent on protein kinase C signalling. Cardiovasc Res. 2006; 70(2):315-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.11.030. View

5.
Yang X, Philipp S, Downey J, Cohen M . Postconditioning's protection is not dependent on circulating blood factors or cells but involves adenosine receptors and requires PI3-kinase and guanylyl cyclase activation. Basic Res Cardiol. 2004; 100(1):57-63. DOI: 10.1007/s00395-004-0498-4. View