» Articles » PMID: 29141843

STABLE-SR (Electrophysiological Substrate Ablation in the Left Atrium During Sinus Rhythm) for the Treatment of Nonparoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective, Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview
Date 2017 Nov 17
PMID 29141843
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) alone or combined with adjuvant substrate modifications is unsatisfactory for atrial fibrillation (AF) control in nonparoxysmal AF patients. Ablation targeting the fibrotic areas after CPVI (STABLE-SR [Electrophysiological Substrate Ablation in the Left Atrium During Sinus Rhythm]) is a newly evolved substrate modification strategy.

Methods And Results: In this multicenter, randomized clinical trial, 229 symptomatic nonparoxysmal AF patients were 1:1 randomized to STABLE-SR group (n=114) or conventional STEPWISE group (n=115). In the STABLE-SR group, after CPVI, cavotricuspid isthmus ablation and cardioversion to sinus rhythm, left atrial high-density mapping was performed. Areas with low-voltage and complex electrogram were further homogenized and eliminated, respectively. Dechanneling would be done if necessary. In the STEPWISE group, additional linear lesions and defragmentation were performed.The primary end point was freedom from documented atrial tachyarrhythmias for ≥30 s after a single ablation procedure without antiarrhythmic medications at 18 months. At 18 months, 74.0% of the patients in the STABLE-SR group and 71.5% in the STEPWISE group (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-1.29; =0.325) achieved success according to intention-to-treat analysis. However, less procedure time (186.8±52.7 versus 210.5±48.0 minutes, <0.001), reduced post-CPVI fluoroscopic time (11.0±7.8 versus 13.7±8.9 minutes, =0.006), and shorter energy delivery time (60.1±25.1 versus 75.0±24.3 minutes, <0.001) were observed in the STABLE-SR group compared with the STEPWISE group.

Conclusions: STABLE-SR is a simplified, personalized, and effective ablation strategy in nonparoxysmal AF patients. More importantly, over 50% nonparoxysmal AF patients do not need further ablation beyond CPVI and therefore can avoid excessive ablation.

Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01761188.

Citing Articles

Integrated Management of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

Yue X, Zhou L, Zhao C Biomedicines. 2025; 13(1).

PMID: 39857675 PMC: 11760448. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13010091.


Effect of Pulmonary Vein Isolation with Left Atrial Wall Isolation Plus Selective CFAE Ablation in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

Pang Y, Yu T, Xu Y, Chen Q, Ling Y, Liu G J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024; 11(10).

PMID: 39452279 PMC: 11508299. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd11100308.


Evaluating the Prognostic Significance of Cystatin C Level Variations Pre- and Post-Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in the Recurrence of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

Zhang Y, Ge J, Ji Y, Zhu Y, Zhu Z, Wang F Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2024; 29(6):e70024.

PMID: 39412033 PMC: 11480812. DOI: 10.1111/anec.70024.


Low-Voltage Area Ablation in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Valcher S, Villaschi A, Falasconi G, Chiarito M, Giunti F, Novelli L J Clin Med. 2024; 13(15).

PMID: 39124807 PMC: 11313645. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13154541.


Deep learning-based multimodal fusion of the surface ECG and clinical features in prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence following catheter ablation.

Qiu Y, Guo H, Wang S, Yang S, Peng X, Xiayao D BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024; 24(1):225.

PMID: 39118118 PMC: 11308714. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02616-x.