» Articles » PMID: 29141082

Diagnostic Accuracy of Pediatric Teledermatology Using Parent-Submitted Photographs: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal JAMA Dermatol
Specialty Dermatology
Date 2017 Nov 16
PMID 29141082
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Advances in smartphone photography (both quality and image transmission) may improve access to care via direct parent-to-clinician telemedicine. However, the accuracy of diagnoses that are reliant on parent-provided photographs has not been formally compared with diagnoses made in person.

Objective: To assess whether smartphone photographs of pediatric skin conditions taken by parents are of sufficient quality to permit accurate diagnosis.

Design, Setting, And Participants: A prospective study was conducted among 40 patient-parent dyads at a pediatric dermatology clinic at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia from March 1 to September 30, 2016, to assess concordance between diagnoses made by an independent pediatric dermatologist based on in-person examination and those based on parental photographs. Half of the patient-parent dyads were randomized for a secondary analysis to receive instructions on how best to take photographs with smartphones. Clinicians were blinded to whether parents had received photography instructions.

Exposures: Half of the patient-parent dyads received a simple, 3-step instruction sheet on how best to take photographs using a smartphone (intervention group); the other half did not (control group).

Main Outcomes And Measures: Concordance between photograph-based vs in-person diagnosis in the intervention vs control groups, as quantified using Cohen κ, a measure of interrater agreement that takes into account the possibility of agreement occurring by chance.

Results: Among the 40 patient-parent dyads (22 female children and 18 male children; mean [SD] age, 6.96 [5.23] years), overall concordance between photograph-based vs in-person diagnosis was 83% (95% CI, 71%-94%; κ = 0.81). Diagnostic concordance was 89% (95% CI, 75%-97%; κ = 0.88) in a subgroup of 37 participants with photographs considered of high enough quality to make a diagnosis. No statistically significant effect of photography instructions on concordance was detected (group that received instructions, 85%; group that did not receive instructions, 80%; P = .68). In cases of diagnostic disagreement, appropriate follow-up was suggested.

Conclusions And Relevance: Parent-operated smartphone photography can accurately be used as a method to provide pediatric dermatologic care.

Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03246945.

Citing Articles

Perspectives and Challenges of Telemedicine and Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Dermatology.

Zama D, Borghesi A, Ranieri A, Manieri E, Pierantoni L, Andreozzi L Children (Basel). 2024; 11(11).

PMID: 39594976 PMC: 11592520. DOI: 10.3390/children11111401.


Effectiveness of Telemedicine in Managing Health-Related Issues in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review.

Taher Do Alfuqhar I, Ali Khalafalla A, Mahmoud Ali S, Aydaross Adam E, Osman H, Safar Alrabie R Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e72144.

PMID: 39440160 PMC: 11495680. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.72144.


Efficacy, perception, and utilization of pediatric teledermatology: A systematic review.

Burshtein J, Buethe M, Ghias M, Buros Stein A, Glick S, Marmon S JAAD Int. 2023; 12:3-11.

PMID: 37228364 PMC: 10203760. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdin.2023.03.005.


Clinical Profile and Diagnostic Accuracy of Patient-submitted Photographs in Teledermatology.

Tuknayat A, Bhalla M, Dogar K, Thami G, Sandhu J J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2023; 16(4):21-25.

PMID: 37077931 PMC: 10110286.


Demographic Data Associated With Digital Inequity Reported in Patient-to-Provider Teledermatology Studies in the United States From 2011 to 2021: Scoping Review.

Miller J, Ioffreda P, Nugent S, Jones E JMIR Dermatol. 2023; 6:e43983.

PMID: 36938315 PMC: 10012205. DOI: 10.2196/43983.


References
1.
Pletcher B, Rimsza M, Cull W, Shipman S, Shugerman R, OConnor K . Primary care pediatricians' satisfaction with subspecialty care, perceived supply, and barriers to care. J Pediatr. 2010; 156(6):1011-1015.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.12.032. View

2.
Warshaw E, Gravely A, Nelson D . Reliability of store and forward teledermatology for skin neoplasms. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015; 72(3):426-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.11.001. View

3.
Whited J, Warshaw E, Kapur K, Edison K, Thottapurathu L, Raju S . Clinical course outcomes for store and forward teledermatology versus conventional consultation: a randomized trial. J Telemed Telecare. 2013; 19(4):197-204. DOI: 10.1177/1357633x13487116. View

4.
Kochmann M, Locatis C . Direct to Consumer Mobile Teledermatology Apps: An Exploratory Study. Telemed J E Health. 2016; 22(8):689-93. PMC: 4982952. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0189. View

5.
Pak H, Triplett C, Lindquist J, Grambow S, Whited J . Store-and-forward teledermatology results in similar clinical outcomes to conventional clinic-based care. J Telemed Telecare. 2007; 13(1):26-30. DOI: 10.1258/135763307779701185. View