Diagnostic Accuracy of Pediatric Teledermatology Using Parent-Submitted Photographs: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Importance: Advances in smartphone photography (both quality and image transmission) may improve access to care via direct parent-to-clinician telemedicine. However, the accuracy of diagnoses that are reliant on parent-provided photographs has not been formally compared with diagnoses made in person.
Objective: To assess whether smartphone photographs of pediatric skin conditions taken by parents are of sufficient quality to permit accurate diagnosis.
Design, Setting, And Participants: A prospective study was conducted among 40 patient-parent dyads at a pediatric dermatology clinic at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia from March 1 to September 30, 2016, to assess concordance between diagnoses made by an independent pediatric dermatologist based on in-person examination and those based on parental photographs. Half of the patient-parent dyads were randomized for a secondary analysis to receive instructions on how best to take photographs with smartphones. Clinicians were blinded to whether parents had received photography instructions.
Exposures: Half of the patient-parent dyads received a simple, 3-step instruction sheet on how best to take photographs using a smartphone (intervention group); the other half did not (control group).
Main Outcomes And Measures: Concordance between photograph-based vs in-person diagnosis in the intervention vs control groups, as quantified using Cohen κ, a measure of interrater agreement that takes into account the possibility of agreement occurring by chance.
Results: Among the 40 patient-parent dyads (22 female children and 18 male children; mean [SD] age, 6.96 [5.23] years), overall concordance between photograph-based vs in-person diagnosis was 83% (95% CI, 71%-94%; κ = 0.81). Diagnostic concordance was 89% (95% CI, 75%-97%; κ = 0.88) in a subgroup of 37 participants with photographs considered of high enough quality to make a diagnosis. No statistically significant effect of photography instructions on concordance was detected (group that received instructions, 85%; group that did not receive instructions, 80%; P = .68). In cases of diagnostic disagreement, appropriate follow-up was suggested.
Conclusions And Relevance: Parent-operated smartphone photography can accurately be used as a method to provide pediatric dermatologic care.
Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03246945.
Perspectives and Challenges of Telemedicine and Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Dermatology.
Zama D, Borghesi A, Ranieri A, Manieri E, Pierantoni L, Andreozzi L Children (Basel). 2024; 11(11).
PMID: 39594976 PMC: 11592520. DOI: 10.3390/children11111401.
Taher Do Alfuqhar I, Ali Khalafalla A, Mahmoud Ali S, Aydaross Adam E, Osman H, Safar Alrabie R Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e72144.
PMID: 39440160 PMC: 11495680. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.72144.
Efficacy, perception, and utilization of pediatric teledermatology: A systematic review.
Burshtein J, Buethe M, Ghias M, Buros Stein A, Glick S, Marmon S JAAD Int. 2023; 12:3-11.
PMID: 37228364 PMC: 10203760. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdin.2023.03.005.
Clinical Profile and Diagnostic Accuracy of Patient-submitted Photographs in Teledermatology.
Tuknayat A, Bhalla M, Dogar K, Thami G, Sandhu J J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2023; 16(4):21-25.
PMID: 37077931 PMC: 10110286.
Miller J, Ioffreda P, Nugent S, Jones E JMIR Dermatol. 2023; 6:e43983.
PMID: 36938315 PMC: 10012205. DOI: 10.2196/43983.