» Articles » PMID: 29137724

Simplified Boundary Conditions Alter Cortical-trabecular Load Sharing at the Distal Radius; A Multiscale Finite Element Analysis

Overview
Journal J Biomech
Specialty Physiology
Date 2017 Nov 16
PMID 29137724
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) derived micro-finite element (FE) modeling is used to evaluate mechanical behavior at the distal radius microstructure. However, these analyses typically simulate non-physiologic simplified platen-compression boundary conditions on a small section of the distal radius. Cortical and trabecular regions contribute uniquely to distal radius mechanical behavior, and various factors affect these regions distinctly. Generalized strength predictions from standardized platen-compression analyses may not adequately capture region specific responses in bone. Our goal was to compare load sharing within the cortical-trabecular compartments between the standardized platen-compression BC simulations, and physiologic BC simulations using a validated multiscale approach. Clinical- and high-resolution images were acquired from nine cadaveric forearm specimens using an HR-pQCT scanner. Multiscale FE models simulating physiologic BCs, and micro-FE only models simulating platen-compression BCs were created for each specimen. Cortical and trabecular loads (N) along the length of the distal radius micro-FE section were compared between BCs using correlations. Principal strain distributions were also compared quantitatively. Cortical and trabecular loads from the platen-compression BC simulations were strongly correlated to the physiologic BC simulations. However, a 30% difference in cortical loads distally, and a 53% difference in trabecular loads proximally was observed under platen BC simulations. Also, distribution of principal strains was clearly different. Our data indicated that platen-compression BC simulations alter cortical-trabecular load sharing. Therefore, results from these analyses should be interpreted in the appropriate mechanical context for clinical evaluations of normal and pathologic mechanical behavior at the distal radius.

Citing Articles

Effects of teriparatide and loading modality on modeling-based and remodeling-based bone formation in the human femoral neck.

Rooney A, Dempster D, Nieves J, Zhou H, Bostrom M, Cosman F Bone. 2022; 157:116342.

PMID: 35092891 PMC: 8941636. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2022.116342.


Bone Mechanoregulation Allows Subject-Specific Load Estimation Based on Time-Lapsed Micro-CT and HR-pQCT .

Walle M, Marques F, Ohs N, Blauth M, Muller R, Collins C Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021; 9:677985.

PMID: 34249883 PMC: 8267803. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.677985.


Exercise Early and Often: Effects of Physical Activity and Exercise on Women's Bone Health.

Troy K, Mancuso M, Butler T, Johnson J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15(5).

PMID: 29710770 PMC: 5981917. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15050878.

References
1.
Schneider P, Reiners C, Cointry G, Capozza R, Ferretti J . Bone quality parameters of the distal radius as assessed by pQCT in normal and fractured women. Osteoporos Int. 2001; 12(8):639-46. DOI: 10.1007/s001980170063. View

2.
Vilayphiou N, Boutroy S, Szulc P, van Rietbergen B, Munoz F, Delmas P . Finite element analysis performed on radius and tibia HR-pQCT images and fragility fractures at all sites in men. J Bone Miner Res. 2011; 26(5):965-73. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.297. View

3.
Burkhart T, Quenneville C, Dunning C, Andrews D . Development and validation of a distal radius finite element model to simulate impact loading indicative of a forward fall. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2014; 228(3):258-71. DOI: 10.1177/0954411914522781. View

4.
Ding M, Odgaard A, Linde F, Hvid I . Age-related variations in the microstructure of human tibial cancellous bone. J Orthop Res. 2002; 20(3):615-21. DOI: 10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00132-2. View

5.
Edwards W, Troy K . Simulating distal radius fracture strength using biomechanical tests: a modeling study examining the influence of boundary conditions. J Biomech Eng. 2011; 133(11):114501. DOI: 10.1115/1.4005428. View