» Articles » PMID: 29135775

Adjustment for Variable Adherence Under Hierarchical Structure: Instrumental Variable Modeling Through Compound Residual Inclusion

Overview
Journal Med Care
Specialty Health Services
Date 2017 Nov 15
PMID 29135775
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Variable adherence to assigned conditions is common in randomized clinical trials.

Objectives: A generalized modeling framework under longitudinal data structures is proposed for regression estimation of the causal effect of variable adherence on outcome, with emphasis upon adjustment for unobserved confounders.

Research Design: A nonlinear, nonparametric random-coefficients modeling approach is described. Estimates of local average treatment effects among compliers can be obtained simultaneously for all assigned conditions to which participants are randomly assigned within the trial. Two techniques are combined to address time-varying and time-invariant unobserved confounding-residual inclusion and nonparametric random-coefficients modeling. Together these yield a compound, 2-stage residual inclusion, instrumental variables model.

Subjects: The proposed method is illustrated through a set of simulation studies to examine small-sample bias and in application to neurocognitive outcome data from a large, multicenter, randomized clinical trial in sleep medicine for continuous positive airway pressure treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

Results: Results of simulation studies indicate that, relative to a standard comparator, the proposed estimator reduces bias in estimates of the causal effect of variable adherence. Bias reductions were greatest at higher levels of residual variance and when confounders were time varying.

Conclusions: The proposed modeling framework is flexible in the distributions of outcomes that can be modeled, applicable to repeated measures longitudinal structures, and provides effective reduction of bias due to unobserved confounders.

Citing Articles

Instrumental variable analyses for causal inference: Application to multilevel analyses of the alliance-outcome relation.

Crits-Christoph P, Gallop R, Gaines A, Rieger A, Connolly Gibbons M Psychother Res. 2018; 30(1):53-67.

PMID: 30451094 PMC: 6525655. DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2018.1544724.


Deception in clinical trials and its impact on recruitment and adherence of study participants.

Lee C, Holmes T, Neri E, Kushida C Contemp Clin Trials. 2018; 72:146-157.

PMID: 30138717 PMC: 6203693. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.08.002.


Joint mixed-effects models for causal inference with longitudinal data.

Shardell M, Ferrucci L Stat Med. 2017; 37(5):829-846.

PMID: 29205454 PMC: 5799019. DOI: 10.1002/sim.7567.


Adherence to continuous positive airway pressure improves attention/psychomotor function and sleepiness: a bias-reduction method with further assessment of APPLES.

Holmes T, Kushida C Sleep Med. 2017; 37:130-134.

PMID: 28899524 PMC: 5609486. DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2017.06.022.

References
1.
Holmes T, Lewis D . Bayesian immunological model development from the literature: example investigation of recent thymic emigrants. J Immunol Methods. 2014; 414:32-50. PMC: 4259859. DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2014.08.001. View

2.
Aitkin M . A general maximum likelihood analysis of variance components in generalized linear models. Biometrics. 2001; 55(1):117-28. DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00117.x. View

3.
Small D, Have T, Joffe M, Cheng J . Random effects logistic models for analysing efficacy of a longitudinal randomized treatment with non-adherence. Stat Med. 2005; 25(12):1981-2007. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2313. View

4.
Slone D, Shapiro S, Miettinen O, Finkle W, STOLLEY P . Drug evaluation after marketing. Ann Intern Med. 1979; 90(2):257-61. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-90-2-257. View

5.
Kushida C, Nichols D, Holmes T, Quan S, Walsh J, Gottlieb D . Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on neurocognitive function in obstructive sleep apnea patients: The Apnea Positive Pressure Long-term Efficacy Study (APPLES). Sleep. 2012; 35(12):1593-602. PMC: 3490352. DOI: 10.5665/sleep.2226. View