» Articles » PMID: 29132364

"I'm Not Strong Enough; I'm Not Good Enough. I Can't Do This, I'm Failing"- A Qualitative Study of Low-socioeconomic Status Smokers' Experiences with Accesssing Cessation Support and the Role for Alternative Technology-based Support

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Nov 15
PMID 29132364
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The social gradient in smoking rates persist with an overrepresentation of smoking and its associated harms concentrated within lower socioeconomic status (SES) populations. Low-SES smokers are motivated to quit but face multiple barriers when engaging a quit attempt. An understanding of the current treatment service model from the perspectives of treatment-seeking low-SES smokers is needed to inform the design of alternative smoking cessation support services tailored to the needs of low-SES populations. This qualitative study aimed to: i) explore low-SES smokers' recent quitting experiences; ii) assess factors that impact treatment engagement; and iii) determine the acceptability and feasibility of alternative approaches to smoking cessation.

Method: Low-SES participants (n = 24) previously enrolled in a smoking cessation RCT participated in either a semi-structured focus group or in-depth telephone interview. Data was obtained and analysed using thematic analysis from October 2015 to June 2016. Analysis was deductive from the interview guide and supplemented inductively.

Results: Participants expressed feelings of guilt and shame around their smoking behaviour and experienced stigmatisation for their smoking. Guilt, shame, and stigmatisation negatively impacted treatment seeking behaviours with most avoiding current quit services. Costs of pharmacotherapy and treatment adherence were commonly cited barriers to treatment success. Electronic-cigarettes were perceived to be unsafe due to uncertainty on their legal status and regulatory restrictions. Technology-based text-messaging quit support was endorsed as a more favourable alternative compared to existing behavioural treatment services.

Conclusion: Stigmatisation was commonly endorsed and acted as an impediment to current treatment utilisation. Electronic-cigarettes may present a viable harm reduction alternative, but their likely uptake in socioeconomically disadvantaged groups in Australia is limited by smokers' uncertainty about their regulation and legality. Mobile phone based cessation support may provide an alternative to telephone counselling and overcome the stigmatisation low-SES smokers face while trying to quit.

Citing Articles

A feature-based qualitative assessment of smoking cessation mobile applications.

Tesfaye L, Wakeman M, Baskin G, Gruse G, Gregory T, Leahy E PLOS Digit Health. 2024; 3(11):e0000658.

PMID: 39571041 PMC: 11581403. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000658.


Perceptions of the Use of Mobile Technologies for Smoking Cessation: Focus Group Study With Individuals of Low Socioeconomic Status Who Smoke.

Wakeman M, Tesfaye L, Gregory T, Leahy E, Kendrick B, El-Toukhy S JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e58221.

PMID: 39392684 PMC: 11512139. DOI: 10.2196/58221.


Tailored text-messaging versus standard Quitline telephone counselling for smoking cessation among people who smoke from a low-socio-economic status background in Australia: A study protocol for a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial (The....

Howard B, Donnelly S, McRobbie H, Barker D, Petrie D, Stockings E Addiction. 2024; 120(1):174-183.

PMID: 39279642 PMC: 11638494. DOI: 10.1111/add.16662.


Introducing Quin: The Design and Development of a Prototype Chatbot to Support Smoking Cessation.

Bendotti H, Ireland D, Lawler S, Oates D, Gartner C, Marshall H Nicotine Tob Res. 2023; 26(5):612-620.

PMID: 37936253 PMC: 11033568. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntad217.


Conversational artificial intelligence interventions to support smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bendotti H, Lawler S, Chan G, Gartner C, Ireland D, Marshall H Digit Health. 2023; 9:20552076231211634.

PMID: 37928336 PMC: 10623979. DOI: 10.1177/20552076231211634.


References
1.
Boland V, Stockings E, Mattick R, McRobbie H, Brown J, Courtney R . The Methodological Quality and Effectiveness of Technology-Based Smoking Cessation Interventions for Disadvantaged Groups: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016; 20(3):276-285. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw391. View

2.
Carter N, Bryant-Lukosius D, DiCenso A, Blythe J, Neville A . The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014; 41(5):545-7. DOI: 10.1188/14.ONF.545-547. View

3.
Roddy E, Antoniak M, Britton J, Molyneux A, Lewis S . Barriers and motivators to gaining access to smoking cessation services amongst deprived smokers--a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006; 6:147. PMC: 1647276. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-147. View

4.
Poland B, Frohlich K, Haines R, Mykhalovskiy E, Rock M, Sparks R . The social context of smoking: the next frontier in tobacco control?. Tob Control. 2006; 15(1):59-63. PMC: 2563620. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2004.009886. View

5.
Courtney R, Naicker S, Shakeshaft A, Clare P, Martire K, Mattick R . Smoking Cessation among Low-Socioeconomic Status and Disadvantaged Population Groups: A Systematic Review of Research Output. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015; 12(6):6403-22. PMC: 4483709. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120606403. View