» Articles » PMID: 29132344

Tubeless Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: an Update Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal BMC Urol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Urology
Date 2017 Nov 15
PMID 29132344
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To update a previously published systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

Methods: A systematic literature search of EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was performed to confirm relevant studies. The scientific literature was screened in accordance with the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. After quality assessment and data extraction from the eligible studies, a meta-analysis was conducted using Stata SE 12.0.

Results: Fourteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1148 patients were included. Combined results demonstrated that tubeless PCNL was significantly associated with shorter operative time (weighted mean difference [WMD], -3.79 min; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6.73 to -0.85; P = 0.012; I = 53.8%), shorter hospital stay (WMD, -1.27 days; 95% CI, -1.65 to -0.90; P < 0.001; I = 98.7%), faster time to return to normal activity (WMD, -4.24 days; 95% CI, -5.76 to -2.71; P < 0.001; I = 97.5%), lower postoperative pain scores (WMD, -16.55 mm; 95% CI, -21.60 to -11.50; P < 0.001; I = 95.7%), less postoperative analgesia requirements (standard mean difference, -1.09 mg; 95% CI, -1.35 to -0.84; P < 0.001; I = 46.8%), and lower urine leakage (Relative risk [RR], 0.30; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.59; P = 0.001; I = 41.2%). There were no significant differences in postoperative hemoglobin reduction (WMD, -0.02 g/dL; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.01; P = 0.172; I = 41.5%), stone-free rate (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.05; P = 0.776; I = 0.0%), postoperative fever rate (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.93; P = 0.867; I = 0.0%), or blood transfusion rate (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.70; P = 0.538; I = 0.0%). The results of subgroup analysis were consistent with the overall findings. The sensitivity analysis indicated that most results remained constant when total tubeless or partial tubeless or mini-PCNL studies were excluded respectively.

Conclusions: Tubeless PCNL is an available and safe option in carefully evaluated and selected patients. It is significantly associated with the advantages of shorter hospital stay, shorter time to return to normal activity, lower postoperative pain scores, less analgesia requirement, and reduced urine leakage.

Citing Articles

Pain management in percutaneous nephrolithotomy - an approach rooted in pathophysiology.

Aibel K, Chang R, Ochuba A, Koo K, Winoker J Nat Rev Urol. 2025; .

PMID: 39806016 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-024-00973-w.


Comparison of External Ureteral Catheter and Double-J stent as Drainage Methods for Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Tania C, Tobing E, Tansol C Int Braz J Urol. 2024; 51(1).

PMID: 39556846 PMC: 11869928. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0356.


Visualizing the landscape of urolithiasis research from 1979-2023: a global bibliometric analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Zyoud S, Abushamma F, Shahwan M, Jairoun A, Shakhshir M, Al-Jabi S Urolithiasis. 2024; 52(1):153.

PMID: 39470824 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-024-01649-1.


Total tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy without retrograde insertion of a ureteral catheter for the treatment of kidney stone patients without hydronephrosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Fu X, Hu W, Deng W, Jin W, Zu X, Zhu G Int Urol Nephrol. 2024; 57(3):759-767.

PMID: 39443433 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-024-04252-w.


[Efficacy and safety of mini-track, mini-nephroscopy and mini-ultrasonic probe percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of 1.5-2.5 cm kidney stones].

Wang M, Liu J, Xiong L, Yu L, Hu H, Xu K Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024; 56(4):605-609.

PMID: 39041553 PMC: 11284484.


References
1.
Zhong Q, Zheng C, Mo J, Piao Y, Zhou Y, Jiang Q . Total tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2012; 27(4):420-6. DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0421. View

2.
Ganpule A, Vijayakumar M, Malpani A, Desai M . Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) a critical review. Int J Surg. 2016; 36(Pt D):660-664. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.11.028. View

3.
Song G, Guo X, Niu G, Wang Y . Advantages of tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of preschool children under 3 years old. J Pediatr Surg. 2015; 50(4):655-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.11.042. View

4.
Zilberman D, Lipkin M, de la Rosette J, Ferrandino M, Mamoulakis C, Laguna M . Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy--the new standard of care?. J Urol. 2010; 184(4):1261-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.020. View

5.
Singh I, Singh A, Mittal G . Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is it really less morbid?. J Endourol. 2008; 22(3):427-34. DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.0269. View