» Articles » PMID: 29131895

Association of Blood Pressure Lowering With Mortality and Cardiovascular Disease Across Blood Pressure Levels: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal JAMA Intern Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Nov 14
PMID 29131895
Citations 158
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: High blood pressure (BP) is the most important risk factor for death and cardiovascular disease (CVD) worldwide. The optimal cutoff for treatment of high BP is debated.

Objective: To assess the association between BP lowering treatment and death and CVD at different BP levels.

Data Sources: Previous systematic reviews were identified from PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effect. Reference lists of these reviews were searched for randomized clinical trials. Randomized clinical trials published after November 1, 2015, were also searched for in PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials during February 2017.

Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials with at least 1000 patient-years of follow-up, comparing BP-lowering drugs vs placebo or different BP goals were included.

Data Extraction And Synthesis: Data were extracted from original publications. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaborations assessment tool. Relative risks (RRs) were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses with Knapp-Hartung modification. Results are reported according to PRISMA guidelines.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Prespecified outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, major cardiovascular events, coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, heart failure, and end-stage renal disease.

Results: Seventy-four unique trials, representing 306 273 unique participants (39.9% women and 60.1% men; mean age, 63.6 years) and 1.2 million person-years, were included in the meta-analyses. In primary prevention, the association of BP-lowering treatment with major cardiovascular events was dependent on baseline systolic BP (SBP). In trials with baseline SBP 160 mm Hg or above, treatment was associated with reduced risk for death (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-1.00) and a substantial reduction of major cardiovascular events (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.70-0.87). If baseline SBP ranged from 140 to 159 mm Hg, the association of treatment with mortality was similar (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.75-1.00), but the association with major cardiovascular events was less pronounced (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96). In trials with baseline SBP below 140 mm Hg, treatment was not associated with mortality (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90-1.06) and major cardiovascular events (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90-1.04). In trials including people with previous CHD and mean baseline SBP of 138 mm Hg, treatment was associated with reduced risk for major cardiovascular events (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.97), but was not associated with survival (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.89-1.07).

Conclusions And Relevance: Primary preventive BP lowering is associated with reduced risk for death and CVD if baseline SBP is 140 mm Hg or higher. At lower BP levels, treatment is not associated with any benefit in primary prevention but might offer additional protection in patients with CHD.

Citing Articles

Effect of intensive versus standard blood pressure control on cardiovascular outcomes in adult patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Haze T, Katsurada K, Sakata S, Kuwabara M, Nishida N, Azegami T Hypertens Res. 2025; .

PMID: 39948181 DOI: 10.1038/s41440-025-02131-0.


Hypertension: A Continuing Public Healthcare Issue.

Goorani S, Zangene S, Imig J Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(1.

PMID: 39795981 PMC: 11720251. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26010123.


Gut Microbiota and Gut-Brain Axis in Hypertension: Implications for Kidney and Cardiovascular Health-A Narrative Review.

Mlynarska E, Wasiak J, Gajewska A, Bilinska A, Stec G, Jasinska J Nutrients. 2024; 16(23).

PMID: 39683474 PMC: 11644008. DOI: 10.3390/nu16234079.


Clinical practice guideline for the management of hypertension in China.

Chin Med J (Engl). 2024; 137(24):2907-2952.

PMID: 39653517 PMC: 11706600. DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003431.


Cardiologists vs Endocrinologists in Glycemic Control for Coronary Artery Disease Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Xia Q, Peng Q, Chen H, Zhang W J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024; 17:5715-5723.

PMID: 39649367 PMC: 11624691. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S494004.


References
1.
Verdecchia P, Staessen J, Angeli F, de Simone G, Achilli A, Ganau A . Usual versus tight control of systolic blood pressure in non-diabetic patients with hypertension (Cardio-Sis): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2009; 374(9689):525-33. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61340-4. View

2.
Asselbergs F, Diercks G, Hillege H, Boven A, Janssen W, Voors A . Effects of fosinopril and pravastatin on cardiovascular events in subjects with microalbuminuria. Circulation. 2004; 110(18):2809-16. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000146378.65439.7A. View

3.
Luders S, Schrader J, Berger J, Unger T, Zidek W, Bohm M . The PHARAO study: prevention of hypertension with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril in patients with high-normal blood pressure: a prospective, randomized, controlled prevention trial of the German Hypertension League. J Hypertens. 2008; 26(7):1487-96. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282ff8864. View

4.
Staessen J, Fagard R, Thijs L, Celis H, Arabidze G, Birkenhager W . Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators. Lancet. 1997; 350(9080):757-64. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)05381-6. View

5.
Parving H, Lehnert H, Brochner-Mortensen J, Gomis R, Andersen S, Arner P . The effect of irbesartan on the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345(12):870-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa011489. View