» Articles » PMID: 29131247

Comparison of Cholecystectomy and Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in Acute Cholecystitis: Results of a Retrospective Study

Overview
Date 2017 Nov 14
PMID 29131247
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To retrospectively compare the clinical outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) and cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis admitted to an urban University Hospital.

Patients And Methods: We studied 646 patients with acute cholecystitis. Ninety patients had placement of a PC at their index hospitalization, and 556 underwent cholecystectomy. Of the 90 patients with PC, 13 underwent subsequent elective cholecystectomy.

Results: Overall, in-hospital mortality and postoperative complications were significantly higher in patients who received PC than in those who underwent cholecystectomy. In the ASA score 1-2 group, patients with PC were significantly older and had a longer postoperative stay while their mortality and morbidity were similar to patients who underwent cholecystectomy. In patients with ASA score of 3, PC and cholecystectomy did not differ significantly for demographic variables and clinical outcomes such as hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications and distribution of complications according to the classification of Clavien-Dildo. In mild, moderate, and severe cholecystitis, patients who underwent PC were significantly older than those who received cholecystectomy. In general, in mild, moderate and severe cholecystitis, the clinical outcomes did not differ significantly between patients who received PC and cholecystectomy. Morbidity was higher in patients with mild cholecystitis who underwent PC. Of the 77 patients dismissed from the hospital with drainage, 12 (15.6%) developed biliary complications and 5 needed substitutions of the drainage itself.

Conclusions: PC does not offer advantages compared to cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Its routine use is therefore questioned. There is need of an adequate, randomized study that compares PC and cholecystectomy in high-risk patients with moderate-severe cholecystitis.

Citing Articles

Indications and clinical outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomies in acute cholecystitis: a study from Qatar.

Ghali M, Ali S, Gibreal K, Singh R, Shehata M, Al-Zoubi R BMC Surg. 2025; 25(1):100.

PMID: 40089720 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-025-02765-4.


International Delphi consensus on the management of percutaneous choleystostomy in acute cholecystitis (E-AHPBA, ANS, WSES societies).

Ramia J, Serradilla-Martin M, Villodre C, Rubio J, Rotellar F, Siriwardena A World J Emerg Surg. 2024; 19(1):32.

PMID: 39396036 PMC: 11470677. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00561-8.


Management of Acute Cholecystitis in High-Risk Patients: Percutaneous Gallbladder Drainage as a Definitive Treatment vs. Emergency Cholecystectomy-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Cirocchi R, Amato L, Ungania S, Buononato M, Tebala G, Cirillo B J Clin Med. 2023; 12(15).

PMID: 37568306 PMC: 10419867. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12154903.


Outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Markopoulos G, Mulita F, Kehagias D, Tsochatzis S, Lampropoulos C, Kehagias I Prz Gastroenterol. 2021; 16(3):188-195.

PMID: 34584579 PMC: 8456769. DOI: 10.5114/pg.2020.100658.


Indian College of Radiology and Imaging Evidence-Based Guidelines for Percutaneous Image-Guided Biliary Procedures.

Madhusudhan K, Jineesh V, Keshava S Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2021; 31(2):421-440.

PMID: 34556927 PMC: 8448229. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1734222.