» Articles » PMID: 29130438

Segmental and Suprasegmental Perception in Children Using Hearing Aids

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Date 2017 Nov 14
PMID 29130438
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Suprasegmental perception (perception of stress, intonation, "how something is said" and "who says it") and segmental speech perception (perception of individual phonemes or perception of "what is said") are perceptual abilities that provide the foundation for the development of spoken language and effective communication. While there are numerous studies examining segmental perception in children with hearing aids (HAs), there are far fewer studies examining suprasegmental perception, especially for children with greater degrees of residual hearing. Examining the relation between acoustic hearing thresholds, and both segmental and suprasegmental perception for children with HAs, may ultimately enable better device recommendations (bilateral HAs, bimodal devices [one CI and one HA in opposite ears], bilateral CIs) for a particular degree of residual hearing. Examining both types of speech perception is important because segmental and suprasegmental cues are affected differentially by the type of hearing device(s) used (i.e., cochlear implant [CI] and/or HA). Additionally, suprathreshold measures, such as frequency resolution ability, may partially predict benefit from amplification and may assist audiologists in making hearing device recommendations.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between audibility (via hearing thresholds and speech intelligibility indices), and segmental and suprasegmental speech perception for children with HAs. A secondary goal is to explore the relationships among frequency resolution ability (via spectral modulation detection [SMD] measures), segmental and suprasegmental speech perception, and receptive language in these same children.

Research Design: A prospective cross-sectional design.

Study Sample: Twenty-three children, ages 4 yr 11 mo to 11 yr 11 mo, participated in the study. Participants were recruited from pediatric clinic populations, oral schools for the deaf, and mainstream schools.

Data Collection And Analysis: Audiological history and hearing device information were collected from participants and their families. Segmental and suprasegmental speech perception, SMD, and receptive vocabulary skills were assessed. Correlations were calculated to examine the significance (p < 0.05) of relations between audibility and outcome measures.

Results: Measures of audibility and segmental speech perception are not significantly correlated, while low-frequency pure-tone average (unaided) is significantly correlated with suprasegmental speech perception. SMD is significantly correlated with all measures (measures of audibility, segmental and suprasegmental perception and vocabulary). Lastly, although age is not significantly correlated with measures of audibility, it is significantly correlated with all other outcome measures.

Conclusions: The absence of a significant correlation between audibility and segmental speech perception might be attributed to overall audibility being maximized through well-fit HAs. The significant correlation between low-frequency unaided audibility and suprasegmental measures is likely due to the strong, predominantly low-frequency nature of suprasegmental acoustic properties. Frequency resolution ability, via SMD performance, is significantly correlated with all outcomes and requires further investigation; its significant correlation with vocabulary suggests that linguistic ability may be partially related to frequency resolution ability. Last, all of the outcome measures are significantly correlated with age, suggestive of developmental effects.

Citing Articles

Effects of Segmental and Suprasegmental Speech Perception on Reading in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Grantham H, Davidson L, Geers A, Uchanski R J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022; 65(9):3583-3594.

PMID: 36001864 PMC: 9913132. DOI: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00035.


American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force Guidelines for Determining Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Children.

Warner-Czyz A, Roland Jr J, Thomas D, Uhler K, Zombek L Ear Hear. 2022; 43(2):268-282.

PMID: 35213891 PMC: 8862774. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001087.


Spectral Resolution Development in Children With Normal Hearing and With Cochlear Implants: A Review of Behavioral Studies.

Jahn K, Arenberg J, Horn D J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022; 65(4):1646-1658.

PMID: 35201848 PMC: 9499384. DOI: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00307.


Spectral Modulation Detection Performance and Speech Perception in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Davidson L, Geers A, Uchanski R Am J Audiol. 2021; 30(4):1076-1087.

PMID: 34670098 PMC: 9126113. DOI: 10.1044/2021_AJA-21-00076.


Effects of Early Acoustic Hearing on Speech Perception and Language for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Davidson L, Geers A, Uchanski R, Firszt J J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019; 62(9):3620-3637.

PMID: 31518517 PMC: 6808345. DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-H-18-0255.

References
1.
Kong Y, Stickney G, Zeng F . Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005; 117(3 Pt 1):1351-61. DOI: 10.1121/1.1857526. View

2.
Saoji A, Litvak L, Spahr A, Eddins D . Spectral modulation detection and vowel and consonant identifications in cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009; 126(3):955-8. DOI: 10.1121/1.3179670. View

3.
Osberger M, Miyamoto R, Kemink J, Stroer B, Firszt J, Novak M . Independent evaluation of the speech perception abilities of children with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant system. Ear Hear. 1991; 12(4 Suppl):66S-80S. DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199108001-00009. View

4.
BOOTHROYD A . Auditory perception of speech contrasts by subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res. 1984; 27(1):134-44. DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2701.134. View

5.
Scollie S . Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level. Ear Hear. 2008; 29(4):543-56. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181734a02. View