» Articles » PMID: 29123997

Noise Levels and Sound Pollution Associated with Various Operative Procedures and Equipments in a Pediatric Dental Environment-A Clinical Study

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2017 Nov 11
PMID 29123997
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To analyse sound levels and sound pollution in a Pediatric Dental Clinic and to analyse whether the levels are significant to the extent of being a health hazard.

Methods: Noise levels were measured in a Pediatric dental clinic in an institutional setting with a precision noise level meter ((HTC 1350). Recordings were taken at different times of the day, at the centre, chair-side, reception, play area and four corners of the department keeping the microphone at a distance of 6 in. from the operator's ear. The noise levels of various equipments i.e. suction, micromotor, airotor were measured with the equipments turned on and during cutting operations with the microphone placed at a distance of 6 in. from the sound source. The sound levels for the laboratory equipments were taken at a distance of 6 in. and 2 m.

Results: The highest mean sound levels were recorded at the reception, play area and chair-side area with least mean sound levels recorded at 9:00am which increased at 11:30am & 2:00pm and reduced again at 3:30pm The maximum sounds were produced by the lathe trimmer, airotor and scaler.

Conclusion: Noise levels in a pediatric clinic approach the level of risk of hearing loss [85 db(A)]. This would have a serious effect on both providers and patients and a concerted effort would be required to control the noise levels and thus avoid the potential health hazards that it poses.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Noise in Paediatric Dentistry and Change in Perception of Operators with Use of Ear Protection Devices.

Deshpande A, Baishya S, Saha S, Sodani V, Shah R, Antala A Noise Health. 2025; 26(123):501-506.

PMID: 39787551 PMC: 11813240. DOI: 10.4103/nah.nah_72_24.


Effect of Titrated Exposure to Non-Traumatic Noise on Unvoiced Speech Recognition in Human Listeners with Normal Audiological Profiles.

Zhang M, Stern R, Moncrieff D, Palmer C, Brown C Trends Hear. 2022; 26:23312165221117081.

PMID: 35929144 PMC: 9403458. DOI: 10.1177/23312165221117081.

References
1.
Miranda F . Protect your hearing. Dental office sounds may be hazardous to your health. J Okla Dent Assoc. 1985; 75(3):38-9. View

2.
Setcos J, Mahyuddin A . Noise levels encountered in dental clinical and laboratory practice. Int J Prosthodont. 1998; 11(2):150-7. View

3.
Kadanakuppe S, Bhat P, Jyothi C, Ramegowda C . Assessment of noise levels of the equipments used in the dental teaching institution, Bangalore. Indian J Dent Res. 2011; 22(3):424-31. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.87065. View

4.
Qsaibati M, Ibrahim O . Noise levels of dental equipment used in dental college of Damascus University. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014; 11(6):624-30. PMC: 4275629. View

5.
KILPATRICK H . Decibel ratings of dental office sounds. J Prosthet Dent. 1981; 45(2):175-8. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(81)90336-x. View