NanoEHS Beyond Toxicity - Focusing on Biocorona

Overview

Journal Environ Sci Nano

Publisher Royal Society of Chemistry

Date 2017 Nov 11

PMID 29123668

Citations 15

Authors

Sijie Lin

Monika Mortimer

Ran Chen

Aleksandr Kakinen

Jim E Riviere

Thomas P Davis

Feng Ding

Pu Chun Ke

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The first phase of environmental health and safety of nanomaterials (nanoEHS) studies has been mainly focused on evidence-based investigations that probe the impact of nanoparticles, nanomaterials and nano-enabled products on biological and ecological systems. The integration of multiple disciplines, including colloidal science, nanomaterial science, chemistry, toxicology/immunology and environmental science, is necessary to understand the implications of nanotechnology for both human health and the environment. While strides have been made in connecting the physicochemical properties of nanomaterials with their hazard potential in tiered models, fundamental understanding of nano-biomolecular interactions and their implications for nanoEHS is largely absent from the literature. Research on nano-biomolecular interactions within the context of natural systems not only provides important clues for deciphering nanotoxicity and nanoparticle-induced pathology, but also presents vast new opportunities for screening beneficial material properties and designing greener products from bottom up. This review highlights new opportunities concerning nano-biomolecular interactions beyond the scope of toxicity.

Citing Articles

Environmental Health and Safety Implications of the Interplay Between Microplastics and the Residing Biofilm.

Wu X, He F, Xu X, Wu L, Rong J, Lin S Environ Health (Wash). 2025; 3(2):118-132.

PMID: 40012871 PMC: 11851218. DOI: 10.1021/envhealth.4c00148.

Protein Corona Formation on Cadmium-Bearing Nanoparticles: Important Role of Facet-Dependent Binding of Cysteine-Rich Proteins.

Qi Y, Guan W, Jiang C, Chen W, Zhang T Environ Health (Wash). 2024; 2(9):623-630.

PMID: 39512393 PMC: 11540113. DOI: 10.1021/envhealth.4c00031.

Comprehensive insights into mechanism of nanotoxicity, assessment methods and regulatory challenges of nanomedicines.

Havelikar U, Ghorpade K, Kumar A, Patel A, Singh M, Banjare N Discov Nano. 2024; 19(1):165.

PMID: 39365367 PMC: 11452581. DOI: 10.1186/s11671-024-04118-1.

Remediation of Metal Oxide Nanotoxicity with a Functional Amyloid.

Wang Y, Liang X, Andrikopoulos N, Tang H, He F, Yin X Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 11(23):e2310314.

PMID: 38582521 PMC: 11187920. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202310314.

SciRAPnano: a pragmatic and harmonized approach for quality evaluation of toxicity data to support risk assessment of nanomaterials.

Shao G, Beronius A, Nymark P Front Toxicol. 2023; 5:1319985.

PMID: 38046400 PMC: 10691260. DOI: 10.3389/ftox.2023.1319985.

References

Dimkpa C, McLean J, Britt D, Johnson W, Arey B, Lea A . Nanospecific inhibition of pyoverdine siderophore production in Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6 by CuO nanoparticles. Chem Res Toxicol. 2012; 25(5):1066-74. DOI: 10.1021/tx3000285. View

Liu S, Zeng T, Hofmann M, Burcombe E, Wei J, Jiang R . Antibacterial activity of graphite, graphite oxide, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide: membrane and oxidative stress. ACS Nano. 2011; 5(9):6971-80. DOI: 10.1021/nn202451x. View

Ding F, Furukawa Y, Nukina N, Dokholyan N . Local unfolding of Cu, Zn superoxide dismutase monomer determines the morphology of fibrillar aggregates. J Mol Biol. 2012; 421(4-5):548-60. PMC: 3320695. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.12.029. View

Xia T, Malasarn D, Lin S, Ji Z, Zhang H, Miller R . Implementation of a multidisciplinary approach to solve complex nano EHS problems by the UC Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology. Small. 2012; 9(9-10):1428-43. DOI: 10.1002/smll.201201700. View

Lin C, Lu T . C60 fullerene derivatized nanoparticles and their application to therapeutics. Recent Pat Nanotechnol. 2012; 6(2):105-13. DOI: 10.2174/187221012800270135. View

Zhao Q, Yang K, Li W, Xing B . Concentration-dependent polyparameter linear free energy relationships to predict organic compound sorption on carbon nanotubes. Sci Rep. 2014; 4:3888. PMC: 3902440. DOI: 10.1038/srep03888. View

Chen R, Riviere J . Biological and environmental surface interactions of nanomaterials: characterization, modeling, and prediction. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2016; 9(3). DOI: 10.1002/wnan.1440. View

Sarkhosh M, Ghasemi J, Ayati M . A quantitative structure- property relationship of gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric retention data of 85 volatile organic compounds as air pollutant materials by multivariate methods. Chem Cent J. 2012; 6 Suppl 2:S4. PMC: 3395126. DOI: 10.1186/1752-153X-6-S2-S4. View

Salvati A, Pitek A, Monopoli M, Prapainop K, Bombelli F, Hristov D . Transferrin-functionalized nanoparticles lose their targeting capabilities when a biomolecule corona adsorbs on the surface. Nat Nanotechnol. 2013; 8(2):137-43. DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2012.237. View

10.

Li J, Wang G, Zhu H, Zhang M, Zheng X, Di Z . Antibacterial activity of large-area monolayer graphene film manipulated by charge transfer. Sci Rep. 2014; 4:4359. PMC: 3950808. DOI: 10.1038/srep04359. View

11.

Radic S, Nedumpully-Govindan P, Chen R, Salonen E, Brown J, Ke P . Effect of fullerenol surface chemistry on nanoparticle binding-induced protein misfolding. Nanoscale. 2014; 6(14):8340-9. DOI: 10.1039/c4nr01544d. View

12.

Kroll A, Behra R, Kaegi R, Sigg L . Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of freshwater biofilms stabilize and modify CeO2 and Ag nanoparticles. PLoS One. 2014; 9(10):e110709. PMC: 4204993. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110709. View

13.

Wu W, Sun X, Yu Y, Hu J, Zhao L, Liu Q . TiO2 nanoparticles promote beta-amyloid fibrillation in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008; 373(2):315-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.06.035. View

14.

Hoffner G, Soues S, Djian P . Aggregation of expanded huntingtin in the brains of patients with Huntington disease. Prion. 2009; 1(1):26-31. PMC: 2633704. DOI: 10.4161/pri.1.1.4056. View

15.

Ding F, Dokholyan N . Simple but predictive protein models. Trends Biotechnol. 2005; 23(9):450-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.07.001. View

16.

Kang S, Herzberg M, Rodrigues D, Elimelech M . Antibacterial effects of carbon nanotubes: size does matter!. Langmuir. 2008; 24(13):6409-13. DOI: 10.1021/la800951v. View

17.

Niu B, Lu W, Yang S, Cai Y, Li G . Support vector machine for SAR/QSAR of phenethyl-amines. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2007; 28(7):1075-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7254.2007.00573.x. View

18.

Loosli F, Le Coustumer P, Stoll S . TiO2 nanoparticles aggregation and disaggregation in presence of alginate and Suwannee River humic acids. pH and concentration effects on nanoparticle stability. Water Res. 2013; 47(16):6052-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.021. View

19.

Lin S, Zhao Y, Xia T, Meng H, Ji Z, Liu R . High content screening in zebrafish speeds up hazard ranking of transition metal oxide nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2011; 5(9):7284-95. PMC: 4136441. DOI: 10.1021/nn202116p. View

20.

Cabaleiro-Lago C, Quinlan-Pluck F, Lynch I, Dawson K, Linse S . Dual effect of amino modified polystyrene nanoparticles on amyloid β protein fibrillation. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2012; 1(4):279-87. PMC: 3368671. DOI: 10.1021/cn900027u. View