» Articles » PMID: 29123495

Likability's Effect on Interpersonal Motor Coordination: Exploring Natural Gaze Direction

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2017 Nov 11
PMID 29123495
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although existing studies indicate a positive effect of interpersonal motor coordination (IMC) on likability, no consensus has been reached as for the effect of likability back onto IMC. The present study specifically investigated the causal effect of likability on IMC and explored, by tracking the natural gaze direction, the possible underlying mechanisms. Twenty-two participants were engaged in an interpersonal finger-tapping task with a confederate in three likability conditions (baseline, likable, and unlikable), while wearing an eye tracker. They had to perform finger tapping at their comfort tempo with the confederate who tapped at the same or 1.5 times of the participant's preferred frequency. Results showed that when tapping at the same frequency, the effect of likability on IMC varied with time. Participants coordinated at a higher level in the baseline condition at the beginning of the coordination task, and a facilitative effect of likability on IMC was revealed in the last session. As a novelty, our results evidenced a positive correlation between IMC and the amount of gaze onto the coordination partner's movement only in the likable condition. No effect of likability was found when the confederate was tapping at 1.5 times of the participant's preferred frequency. Our research suggests that the psychosocial property of the coordinating partner should be taken into consideration when investigating the performance of IMC and that IMC is a parameter that is sensitive to multiple factors.

Citing Articles

Which factors modulate spontaneous motor tempo? A systematic review of the literature.

Desbernats A, Martin E, Tallet J Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1161052.

PMID: 37920737 PMC: 10619865. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1161052.


Humility and Competence: Which Attribute Affects Social Relationships at Work?.

Teoh A, Kriwangko L Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(10).

PMID: 35627506 PMC: 9140553. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19105969.


Physiological synchrony predicts observational threat learning in humans.

Parnamets P, Espinosa L, Olsson A Proc Biol Sci. 2020; 287(1927):20192779.

PMID: 32429814 PMC: 7287361. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2779.


Paired walkers with better first impression synchronize better.

Cheng M, Kato M, Saunders J, Tseng C PLoS One. 2020; 15(2):e0227880.

PMID: 32084136 PMC: 7034894. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227880.


The impact of slippage on the data quality of head-worn eye trackers.

Niehorster D, Santini T, Hessels R, Hooge I, Kasneci E, Nystrom M Behav Res Methods. 2020; 52(3):1140-1160.

PMID: 31898290 PMC: 7280360. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01307-0.


References
1.
Cesario J, Plaks J, Higgins E . Automatic social behavior as motivated preparation to interact. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006; 90(6):893-910. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.893. View

2.
Varlet M, Richardson M . Computation of continuous relative phase and modulation of frequency of human movement. J Biomech. 2011; 44(6):1200-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.02.001. View

3.
Arolt V, Lencer R, Nolte A, Muller-Myhsok B, Purmann S, Schurmann M . Eye tracking dysfunction is a putative phenotypic susceptibility marker of schizophrenia and maps to a locus on chromosome 6p in families with multiple occurrence of the disease. Am J Med Genet. 1996; 67(6):564-79. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19961122)67:6<564::AID-AJMG10>3.0.CO;2-R. View

4.
Ramseyer F, Tschacher W . Nonverbal synchrony in psychotherapy: coordinated body movement reflects relationship quality and outcome. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011; 79(3):284-95. DOI: 10.1037/a0023419. View

5.
Kupper Z, Ramseyer F, Hoffmann H, Tschacher W . Nonverbal Synchrony in Social Interactions of Patients with Schizophrenia Indicates Socio-Communicative Deficits. PLoS One. 2015; 10(12):e0145882. PMC: 4696745. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145882. View