» Articles » PMID: 29122968

Energy Landscape Differences Among Integrins Establish the Framework for Understanding Activation

Overview
Journal J Cell Biol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2017 Nov 11
PMID 29122968
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Why do integrins differ in basal activity, and how does affinity for soluble ligand correlate with cellular adhesiveness? We show that basal conformational equilibrium set points for integrin αβ are cell type specific and differ from integrin αβ when the two integrins are coexpressed on the same cell. Although αβ is easier to activate, its high-affinity state binds vascular cell adhesion molecule and fibronectin 100- to 1,000-fold more weakly than αβ binds fibronectin. Furthermore, the difference in affinity between the high- and low-affinity states is more compressed in αβ (600- to 800-fold) than in αβ (4,000- to 6,000-fold). αβ basal conformational equilibria differ among three cell types, define affinity for soluble ligand and readiness for priming, and may reflect differences in interactions with intracellular adaptors but do not predict cellular adhesiveness for immobilized ligand. The measurements here provide a necessary framework for understanding integrin activation in intact cells, including activation of integrin adhesiveness by application of tensile force by the cytoskeleton, across ligand-integrin-adaptor complexes.

Citing Articles

Compressive stresses in cancer: characterization and implications for tumour progression and treatment.

Linke J, Munn L, Jain R Nat Rev Cancer. 2024; 24(11):768-791.

PMID: 39390249 DOI: 10.1038/s41568-024-00745-z.


Low-affinity LFA1-dependent outside-in signaling mediates avidity modulation via the Rabin8-Rab8 axis.

Kondo N, Ueda Y, Kinashi T PNAS Nexus. 2024; 3(8):pgae332.

PMID: 39170909 PMC: 11337121. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae332.


An αIIbβ3 monoclonal antibody traps a semiextended conformation and allosterically inhibits large ligand binding.

Wang L, Wang J, Li J, Walz T, Coller B Blood Adv. 2024; 8(16):4398-4409.

PMID: 38968144 PMC: 11375269. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013177.


Synthetic integrin antibodies discovered by yeast display reveal αV subunit pairing preferences with β subunits.

Hao Y, Yan J, Fraser C, Jiang A, Anuganti M, Zhang R MAbs. 2024; 16(1):2365891.

PMID: 38889315 PMC: 11188837. DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2024.2365891.


Ligand binding initiates single-molecule integrin conformational activation.

Li J, Jo M, Yan J, Hall T, Lee J, Lopez-Sanchez U Cell. 2024; 187(12):2990-3005.e17.

PMID: 38772370 PMC: 11162317. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.04.049.


References
1.
Schurpf T, Springer T . Regulation of integrin affinity on cell surfaces. EMBO J. 2011; 30(23):4712-27. PMC: 3243613. DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2011.333. View

2.
Zhu J, Luo B, Barth P, Schonbrun J, Baker D, Springer T . The structure of a receptor with two associating transmembrane domains on the cell surface: integrin alphaIIbbeta3. Mol Cell. 2009; 34(2):234-49. PMC: 2694939. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.02.022. View

3.
Zhu J, Zhu J, Springer T . Complete integrin headpiece opening in eight steps. J Cell Biol. 2013; 201(7):1053-68. PMC: 3691460. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201212037. View

4.
Schmidt T, Ye F, Situ A, An W, Ginsberg M, Ulmer T . A Conserved Ectodomain-Transmembrane Domain Linker Motif Tunes the Allosteric Regulation of Cell Surface Receptors. J Biol Chem. 2016; 291(34):17536-46. PMC: 5016151. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M116.733683. View

5.
Takagi J, Strokovich K, Springer T, Walz T . Structure of integrin alpha5beta1 in complex with fibronectin. EMBO J. 2003; 22(18):4607-15. PMC: 212714. DOI: 10.1093/emboj/cdg445. View