» Articles » PMID: 29121883

The Association of Duration of Boarding in the Emergency Room and the Outcome of Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

Overview
Journal BMC Emerg Med
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2017 Nov 11
PMID 29121883
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The demand for critical care beds is increasing out of proportion to bed availability. As a result, some critically ill patients are kept in the Emergency Department (ED boarding) awaiting bed availability. The aim of our study is to examine the impact of boarding in the ED on the outcome of patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit(ICU).

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of ICU data collected prospectively at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh from ED between January 2010 and December 2012 and all patients admitted during this time were evaluated for their duration of boarding. Patients were stratified into three groups according to the duration of boarding from ED. Those admitted less than 6 h were classified as Group I, between 6 and 24 h, Group II and more than 24 h as Group III. We carried out multivariate analysis to examine the independent association of boarding time with the outcome adjusting for variables like age, sex, APACHE, Mechanical ventilation, Creatinine, Platelets, INR.

Results: During the study period, 940 patients were admitted from the ED to ICU, amongst whom 227 (25%) were admitted to ICU within 6 h, 358 (39%) within 6-24 h and 355 (38%) after 24 h. Patients admitted to ICU within 6 h were younger [48.7 ± 22.2(group I) years, 50.6 ± 22.6 (group II), 58.2 ± 20.9 (group III) (P = 0.04)]with less mechanical ventilation duration[5.9 ± 8.9 days (Group I), 6.5 ± 8.1 (Group II) and 10.6 ± 10.5 (Group III), P = 0.04]. There was a significant increase in hospital mortality [51(22.5), 104(29.1), 132(37.2), P = 0.0006) and the ICU length of stay(LOS) [9.55 days (Group I), 9.8 (Group II) and 10.6 (Group III), (P = 0.002)] with increase in boarding duration. In addition, the delay in admission was an independent risk factor for ICU mortality(OR for group III vs group I is 1.90, P = 0.04) and hospital mortality(OR for group III vs Group I is 2.09, P = 0.007).

Conclusion: Boarding in the ED is associated with higher mortality. This data highlights the importance of this phenomenon and suggests the need for urgent measures to reduce boarding and to improve patient flow.

Citing Articles

Correlation Between Emergency Department Crowding and Adverse Occurrences in an Academic Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Alassaf W, Albrahim R, Abukhaled J, Aldhaif M, Mohammed M, Al Baiz A Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025; 18:561-568.

PMID: 39990614 PMC: 11847434. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S504578.


Sepsis in Brazilian emergency departments.

Cornelius A Intern Emerg Med. 2024; 19(6):1531-1532.

PMID: 38900238 DOI: 10.1007/s11739-024-03680-x.


Emergency critical care: closing the gap between onset of critical illness and intensive care unit admission.

Dunser M, Noitz M, Tschoellitsch T, Bruckner M, Brunner M, Eichler B Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024; 136(23-24):651-661.

PMID: 38755419 PMC: 11632058. DOI: 10.1007/s00508-024-02374-w.


Geriatric Population Triage: The Risk of Real-Life Over- and Under-Triage in an Overcrowded ED: 4- and 5-Level Triage Systems Compared: The CREONTE (Crowding and R E Organization National TriagE) Study.

Savioli G, Ceresa I, Bressan M, Piccini G, Novelli V, Cutti S J Pers Med. 2024; 14(2).

PMID: 38392628 PMC: 10890089. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14020195.


Intensive care unit admission from the emergency department in the setting of National Emergency Access Targets.

DArcy J, Doherty S, Fletcher L, Serpa Neto A, Jones D Crit Care Resusc. 2023; 25(2):84-89.

PMID: 37876604 PMC: 10581270. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.05.005.


References
1.
Gordon J, Billings J, Asplin B, Rhodes K . Safety net research in emergency medicine: proceedings of the Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference on "The Unraveling Safety Net". Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8(11):1024-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01110.x. View

2.
Metcalfe M, Sloggett A, McPherson K . Mortality among appropriately referred patients refused admission to intensive-care units. Lancet. 1997; 350(9070):7-11. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)10018-0. View

3.
Trzeciak S, Rivers E . Emergency department overcrowding in the United States: an emerging threat to patient safety and public health. Emerg Med J. 2003; 20(5):402-5. PMC: 1726173. DOI: 10.1136/emj.20.5.402. View

4.
Saukkonen K, Varpula M, Rasanen P, Roine R, Voipio-Pulkki L, Pettila V . The effect of emergency department delay on outcome in critically ill medical patients: evaluation using hospital mortality and quality of life at 6 months. J Intern Med. 2006; 260(6):586-91. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01716.x. View

5.
Chalfin D, Trzeciak S, Likourezos A, Baumann B, Dellinger R . Impact of delayed transfer of critically ill patients from the emergency department to the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2007; 35(6):1477-83. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000266585.74905.5A. View