» Articles » PMID: 29121226

Optical Frequency Domain Imaging Vs. Intravascular Ultrasound in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (OPINION Trial): One-year Angiographic and Clinical Results

Abstract

Aims: Optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) is a recently developed, light-based, high-resolution intravascular imaging technique. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a widely used, conventional imaging technique for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of OFDI-guided PCI compared with IVUS-guided PCI in terms of clinical outcomes.

Methods And Results: We did a prospective, multicentre, randomized (ratio 1:1), active-controlled, non-inferiority study to compare head-to-head OFDI vs. IVUS in patients undergoing PCI with a second generation drug-eluting stent. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure defined as a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel related myocardial infarction, and ischaemia-driven target vessel revascularization until 12 months after the PCI. The major secondary endpoint was angiographic binary restenosis at 8 months. We randomly allocated 829 patients to receive OFDI-guided PCI (n = 414) or IVUS-guided PCI (n = 415). Target vessel failure occurred in 21 (5.2%) of 401 patients undergoing OFDI-guided PCI, and 19 (4.9%) of 390 patients undergoing IVUS-guided PCI, demonstrating non-inferiority of OFDI-guided PCI to IVUS-guided PCI (hazard ratio 1.07, upper limit of one-sided 95% confidence interval 1.80; Pnon-inferiority = 0.042). With 89.8% angiographic follow-up, the rate of binary restenosis was comparable between OFDI-guided PCI and IVUS-guided PCI (in-stent: 1.6% vs. 1.6%, P = 1.00; and in-segment: 6.2% vs. 6.0%, P = 1.00).

Conclusion: The 12-month clinical outcome in patients undergoing OFDI-guided PCI was non-inferior to that of patients undergoing IVUS-guided PCI. Both OFDI-guided and IVUS-guided PCI yielded excellent angiographic and clinical results, with very low rates of 8-month angiographic binary restenosis and 12-month target vessel failure.

Clinical Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01873027.

Citing Articles

Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease on Maintenance Dialysis.

Lin C, Hsiao F, Tung Y, Hsu T, Chou S, Lin Y JACC Asia. 2025; 5(1):28-41.

PMID: 39886188 PMC: 11775808. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.10.006.


Expert consensus statement for quantitative measurement and morphologic assessment of optical coherence tomography: update 2025.

Fujii K, Kubo T, Otake H, Nakazawa G, Sonoda S, Hibi K Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2025; 40(2):226-233.

PMID: 39873844 DOI: 10.1007/s12928-024-01080-8.


Unlocking the Secrets of Acute Coronary Syndromes Using Intravascular Imaging: From Pathophysiology to Improving Outcomes.

Apostolos A, Karanasos A, Ktenopoulos N, Tsalamandris S, Vlachakis P, Kachrimanidis I J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685545 PMC: 11642377. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237087.


Deep-learning-driven optical coherence tomography analysis for cardiovascular outcome prediction in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Hamana T, Nishimori M, Shibata S, Kawamori H, Toba T, Hiromasa T Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024; 5(6):692-701.

PMID: 39563910 PMC: 11570387. DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae067.


Consensus of the National Heart Center in collaboration With the Saudi Arabian Cardiac Interventional Society on the Clinical Use of Intracoronary Imaging.

Alasnag M, Alameer M, Alshehri A, Alosaimi H, Alqoofi F, Alzayer H J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2024; 36(2):137-157.

PMID: 39469526 PMC: 11518001. DOI: 10.37616/2212-5043.1387.


References
1.
Zhang Y, Farooq V, Garcia-Garcia H, Bourantas C, Tian N, Dong S . Comparison of intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: a meta-analysis of one randomised trial and ten observational studies involving 19,619 patients. EuroIntervention. 2012; 8(7):855-65. DOI: 10.4244/EIJV8I7A129. View

2.
Kim I, Yoon H, Shin E, Kim M, Park J, Cho Y . Usefulness of Frequency Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Compared with Intravascular Ultrasound as a Guidance for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. J Interv Cardiol. 2016; 29(2):216-24. DOI: 10.1111/joic.12276. View

3.
Kubo T, Shinke T, Okamura T, Hibi K, Nakazawa G, Morino Y . Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. J Cardiol. 2016; 68(5):455-460. DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.11.007. View

4.
Kubo T, Akasaka T, Shite J, Suzuki T, Uemura S, Yu B . OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 6(10):1095-1104. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.04.014. View

5.
Wijns W, Shite J, Jones M, Lee S, Price M, Fabbiocchi F . Optical coherence tomography imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention impacts physician decision-making: ILUMIEN I study. Eur Heart J. 2015; 36(47):3346-55. PMC: 4677272. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv367. View