» Articles » PMID: 29114618

Orthogonal Image Pairs Coupled with OSMS for Noncoplanar Beam Angle, Intracranial, Single-isocenter, SRS Treatments with Multiple Targets on the Varian Edge Radiosurgery System

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2017 Nov 9
PMID 29114618
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To characterize the accuracy of noncoplanar image guided radiation therapy with the Varian Edge radiosurgery system for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatments by assessing the accuracy of kV/kV orthogonal pair registration with Optical Surface Monitoring System (OSMS) monitoring relative to cone beam computed tomography (CT).

Methods And Materials: A Computerized Imaging Reference System head phantom and Encompass SRS Immobilization System were used to determine collision-free space for orthogonal image pairs (kV/kV) for couch rotations (CRs) of 45°, 30°, 15°, 345°, 330°, and 315°. Couch-induced shifts were measured using kV/kV orthogonal image pairs, OSMS, and cone beam CT. The kV/kV image pairs and OSMS localization accuracy was also assessed with respect to cone beam CT.

Results: Mean orthogonal image pair differences for 315°, 330°, 345°, 15°, 30°, and 45° CRs were ≤±0.60 mm and ±0.37°. OSMS localization accuracy was ≤±0.25 mm and ±0.20°. Correspondingly, kV/kV localization accuracy was ≤±0.30 mm and ±0.5°. Shift differences for various image pairs at all CRs were ≤±1.10 mm and ±0.7°. Cone beam CT deviation was 0.10 mm and 0.00° without patient motion or CR.

Conclusion: Based on our study, CR-induced shifts with the Varian Edge radiosurgery system will not produce noticeable dosimetric effects for SRS treatments. Thus, replacing cone beam CT with orthogonal kV/kV pairs coupled with OSMS at the treatment couch angle could reduce the number of cone beam CT scans that are acquired during a standard SRS treatment while providing an accurate and safe treatment with negligible dosimetric effects on the treatment plan.

Citing Articles

New findings on clinical experience on surface-guided radiotherapy for frameless non-coplanar stereotactic radiosurgery treatments.

Sanchez-Rubio P, Rodriguez-Romero R, Pinto-Monedero M, Alejo-Luque L, Martinez-Ortega J J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024; 25(12):e14510.

PMID: 39287562 PMC: 11633809. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14510.


Non-coplanar CBCT image reconstruction using a generative adversarial network for non-coplanar radiotherapy.

Wei R, Song Z, Pan Z, Cao Y, Song Y, Dai J J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024; 25(10):e14487.

PMID: 39186746 PMC: 11466471. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14487.


Going from 3D/3D to 2D/3D registration for noncoplanar setup verification in intracranial single-isocenter multiple-target hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: comparison between kilo-voltage/mega-voltage image pairs and noncoplanar cone-beam....

Lai J, Liu S, Liu J, Fu M, Jiang M, Li A Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023; 13(12):8094-8106.

PMID: 38106274 PMC: 10722029. DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-463.


Visual analysis of image-guided radiation therapy based on bibliometrics: A review.

Yuan J, Li Q, Shen Y Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(8):e32989.

PMID: 36827068 PMC: 11309653. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032989.


Dosimetric Analysis of Intra-Fraction Motion Detected by Surface-Guided Radiation Therapy During Linac Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

Foster R, Moeller B, Robinson M, Bright M, Ruiz J, Hampton C Adv Radiat Oncol. 2023; 8(3):101151.

PMID: 36691448 PMC: 9860342. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101151.


References
1.
Klein E, Hanley J, Bayouth J, Yin F, Simon W, Dresser S . Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators. Med Phys. 2009; 36(9):4197-212. DOI: 10.1118/1.3190392. View

2.
Clark G, Popple R, Young P, Fiveash J . Feasibility of single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc radiosurgery for treatment of multiple brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 76(1):296-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.029. View

3.
Nath S, Lawson J, Simpson D, Vanderspek L, Wang J, Alksne J . Single-isocenter frameless intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery for simultaneous treatment of multiple brain metastases: clinical experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 78(1):91-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1726. View

4.
Ramakrishna N, Rosca F, Friesen S, Tezcanli E, Zygmanszki P, Hacker F . A clinical comparison of patient setup and intra-fraction motion using frame-based radiosurgery versus a frameless image-guided radiosurgery system for intracranial lesions. Radiother Oncol. 2010; 95(1):109-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.12.030. View

5.
Verbakel W, Lagerwaard F, Verduin A, Heukelom S, Slotman B, Cuijpers J . The accuracy of frameless stereotactic intracranial radiosurgery. Radiother Oncol. 2010; 97(3):390-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.06.012. View