» Articles » PMID: 29109236

History-Dependent Odor Processing in the Mouse Olfactory Bulb

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Nov 8
PMID 29109236
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In nature, animals normally perceive sensory information on top of backgrounds. Thus, the neural substrate to perceive under background conditions is inherent in all sensory systems. Where and how sensory systems process backgrounds is not fully understood. In olfaction, just a few studies have addressed the issue of odor coding on top of continuous odorous backgrounds. Here, we tested how background odors are encoded by mitral cells (MCs) in the olfactory bulb (OB) of male mice. Using two-photon calcium imaging, we studied how MCs responded to odors in isolation versus their responses to the same odors on top of continuous backgrounds. We show that MCs adapt to continuous odor presentation and that mixture responses are different when preceded by background. In a subset of odor combinations, this history-dependent processing was useful in helping to identify target odors over background. Other odorous backgrounds were highly dominant such that target odors were completely masked by their presence. Our data are consistent in both low and high odor concentrations and in anesthetized and awake mice. Thus, odor processing in the OB is strongly influenced by the recent history of activity, which could have a powerful impact on how odors are perceived. We examined a basic feature of sensory processing in the olfactory bulb. Specifically, we measured how mitral cells adapt to continuous background odors and how target odors are encoded on top of such background. Our results show clear differences in odor coding based on the immediate history of the stimulus. Our results support the argument that odor coding in the olfactory bulb depends on the recent history of the sensory environment.

Citing Articles

Fast updating feedback from piriform cortex to the olfactory bulb relays multimodal identity and reward contingency signals during rule-reversal.

Hernandez D, Ciuparu A, Garcia da Silva P, Velasquez C, Rebouillat B, Gross M Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):937.

PMID: 39843439 PMC: 11754465. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56023-5.


Projection neurons are necessary for the maintenance of the mouse olfactory circuit.

Sanchez-Guardado L, Razavi P, Wang B, Callejas-Marin A, Lois C Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39671236 PMC: 11643621. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.90296.


Dense and Persistent Odor Representations in the Olfactory Bulb of Awake Mice.

Pirhayati D, Smith C, Kroeger R, Navlakha S, Pfaffinger P, Reimer J J Neurosci. 2024; 44(39).

PMID: 39187379 PMC: 11426377. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0116-24.2024.


Neurogenesis dynamics in the olfactory bulb: deciphering circuitry organization, function, and adaptive plasticity.

Naffaa M Neural Regen Res. 2024; 20(6):1565-1581.

PMID: 38934393 PMC: 11688548. DOI: 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-00312.


Towards detection of cancer biomarkers in human exhaled air by transfer-learning-powered analysis of odor-evoked calcium activity in rat olfactory bulb.

Kopeliovich M, Petrushan M, Matukhno A, Lysenko L Heliyon. 2024; 10(1):e20173.

PMID: 38173493 PMC: 10761347. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20173.


References
1.
Stevenson R, Wilson D . Odour perception: an object-recognition approach. Perception. 2008; 36(12):1821-33. DOI: 10.1068/p5563. View

2.
Chen Q, Cichon J, Wang W, Qiu L, Lee S, Campbell N . Imaging neural activity using Thy1-GCaMP transgenic mice. Neuron. 2012; 76(2):297-308. PMC: 4059513. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.07.011. View

3.
Adam Y, Livneh Y, Miyamichi K, Groysman M, Luo L, Mizrahi A . Functional transformations of odor inputs in the mouse olfactory bulb. Front Neural Circuits. 2014; 8:129. PMC: 4219419. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2014.00129. View

4.
Lin D, Zhang S, Block E, Katz L . Encoding social signals in the mouse main olfactory bulb. Nature. 2005; 434(7032):470-7. DOI: 10.1038/nature03414. View

5.
Carandini M, Heeger D . Normalization as a canonical neural computation. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011; 13(1):51-62. PMC: 3273486. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3136. View