» Articles » PMID: 29104741

Lymph Node Imaging in Initial Staging of Prostate Cancer: An Overview and Update

Overview
Journal World J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2017 Nov 7
PMID 29104741
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Accurate nodal staging at the time of diagnosis of prostate cancer is crucial in determining a treatment plan for the patient. Pelvic lymph node dissection is the most reliable method, but is less than perfect and has increased morbidity. Cross sectional imaging with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are non-invasive tools that rely on morphologic characteristics such as shape and size of the lymph nodes. However, lymph nodes harboring metastatic disease may be normal sized and non-metastatic lymph nodes may be enlarged due to reactive hyperplasia. The optimal strategy for preoperative staging remains a topic of ongoing research. Advanced imaging techniques to assess lymph nodes in the setting of prostate cancer utilizing novel MRI contrast agents as well as positron emission tomography (PET) tracers have been developed and continue to be studied. Magnetic resonance lymphography utilizing ultra-small super paramagnetic iron oxide has shown promising results in detection of metastatic lymph nodes. Combining MRL with diffusion-weighted imaging may also improve accuracy. Considerable efforts are being made to develop effective PET radiotracers that are performed using hybrid-imaging systems that combine PET with CT or MRI. PET tracers that will be reviewed in this article include [F]fluoro-D-glucose, sodium [F]fluoride, [F]choline, [C]choline, prostate specific membrane antigen binding ligands, [C]acetate, [F]fluciclovine, gastrin releasing peptide receptor ligands, and androgen binding receptors. This article will review these advanced imaging modalities and ability to detect prostate cancer metastasis to lymph nodes. While more research is needed, these novel techniques to image lymph nodes in the setting of prostate cancer show a promising future in improving initial lymph node staging.

Citing Articles

From Oncogenesis to Theranostics: The Transformative Role of PSMA in Prostate Cancer.

Hameed M, Gul M, Chaudhry A, Muzaffar H, Sheikh M, Chee W Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(17).

PMID: 39272896 PMC: 11394180. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16173039.


Diagnostic Accuracy of Molecular Imaging Techniques for Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Alshamrani A Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(13).

PMID: 39001206 PMC: 11240585. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14131315.


Reasons for Discordance between Ga-PSMA-PET and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Wang J, ODwyer E, Martinez Zuloaga J, Subramanian K, Hu J, Jhanwar Y Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 38893178 PMC: 11171071. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112056.


Comparison of Multiparametric MRI, [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT, and Clinical Nomograms for Primary T and N Staging of Intermediate-to-High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Tayara O, Pelka K, Kunikowska J, Malewski W, Sklinda K, Kamecki H Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(24).

PMID: 38136382 PMC: 10741730. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245838.


18 F-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for lymph node staging in medium/high risk prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lv Z, Song L, Wang M, Hou H, Li H, Wang X Chin Med J (Engl). 2023; 137(8):949-958.

PMID: 37690993 PMC: 11046020. DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002850.


References
1.
Suzuki H, Inoue Y, Fujimoto H, Yonese J, Tanabe K, Fukasawa S . Diagnostic performance and safety of NMK36 (trans-1-amino-3-[18F] fluorocyclobutanecarboxylic acid)-PET/CT in primary prostate pancer: multicenter Phase IIb clinical trial. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016; 47(3):283. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyw177. View

2.
Burkhard F, Studer U . The role of lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer. Urol Oncol. 2004; 22(3):198-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2004.04.032. View

3.
Odewole O, Tade F, Nieh P, Savir-Baruch B, Jani A, Master V . Recurrent prostate cancer detection with anti-3-[(18)F]FACBC PET/CT: comparison with CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016; 43(10):1773-83. PMC: 4970909. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-016-3383-8. View

4.
Davis G . Sensitivity of frozen section examination of pelvic lymph nodes for metastatic prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 1995; 76(4):661-8. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950815)76:4<661::aid-cncr2820760419>3.0.co;2-s. View

5.
Wunderbaldinger P, Josephson L, Bremer C, Moore A, Weissleder R . Detection of lymph node metastases by contrast-enhanced MRI in an experimental model. Magn Reson Med. 2002; 47(2):292-7. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10068. View