» Articles » PMID: 29102129

An Overview of Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Designs

Overview
Journal Hear Res
Date 2017 Nov 6
PMID 29102129
Citations 97
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cochlear implant electrode arrays are designed with specific characteristics that allow for the preservation of intra-cochlear structures during the insertion process, as well as during explantation. Straight lateral wall (LW) electrode arrays and pre-curved modiolar hugging (MH) electrode arrays are the two types that are commercially available. Although there is a third type of electrode array called the mid-scala (MS), which is positioned in the middle of the scala tympani (ST), and is usually considered as an MH type of electrode. Different lengths of straight LW electrode arrays are currently available which allow for insertion across a range of different sized cochleae; however, due to manufacturing limitations, pre-curved MH electrodes are generally only available to cover the basal turn of the cochlea, while the spiral ganglion cells are distributed in the Rosenthal's canal that extends into 1.75 turns of the cochlea. Both straight LW and pre-curved MH electrodes can cause a certain degree of intra-cochlear trauma, but pre-curved MH electrodes tend to deviate into the scala vestibuli from the scala tympani more often than the straight LW electrodes, resulting in damage to the osseous spiral lamina/spiral ligament which could initiate new bone formation and eventually affect the cochlear implant users' hearing performance. Structural damage to the cochlea could also affect the vestibular function. With pre-curved MH electrodes, higher degrees of trauma are related to the fixed curling geometry of the electrode in relation to the variable coiling pattern of individual cochleae, the orientation of the electrode contacts in relation to the modiolus wall, and how effectively the stylet was handled by the surgeon during the procedure. Wire management, metal density, and the shore hardness of the silicone elastomer all contribute to the stiffness/flexibility of the electrode. It is important to acknowledge the impact of bringing the stimulating contacts closer to the modiolus wall with an MH electrode type in terms of the resultant damage to intra-cochlear structures. The presence of malformed cochleae should be identified and appropriate electrodes should be chosen for each specific cochlea, irrespective of the cochlear implant brand. In order to utilize drug therapy, the cochlea should be free from any trauma.

Citing Articles

Cochlear implantation with Slim Modiolar Electrode carriers enables hearing preservation.

Sakmen K, Issing C, Vazzana C, Weissgerber T, Linke A, Stover T Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025; .

PMID: 40009181 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-025-09267-2.


Preclinical evaluation of a hydraulic actuation system with guide tube for robotic cochlear implant electrode insertion.

Cramer J, Salcher R, Frohlich M, Bottcher-Rebmann G, Artukarslan E, Lenarz T Biomed Eng Online. 2025; 24(1):19.

PMID: 39953541 PMC: 11829445. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-025-01338-z.


Influence of surgeon experience on the incidence of tip fold-over with slim preformed cochlear implant electrodes.

Knorle E, Vazzana C, Stover T, Helbig S Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025; .

PMID: 39891694 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-025-09235-w.


Animal models of cochlear implant: Classification and update.

Du H, Li J, Chen W, Guo W, Yang S J Otol. 2024; 19(3):173-177.

PMID: 39735242 PMC: 11681794. DOI: 10.1016/j.joto.2024.05.002.


Frequency-to-Place Mismatch and Cochlear Implant Outcomes by Electrode Type.

DeFreese A, Berg K, Noble J, Dawant B, Holder J, Amberg S JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 151(2):135-142.

PMID: 39666319 PMC: 11826361. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.4158.