» Articles » PMID: 29100871

Overt and Covert Attention to Location-based Reward

Overview
Journal Vision Res
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2017 Nov 5
PMID 29100871
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent research on the impact of location-based reward on attentional orienting has indicated that reward factors play an influential role in spatial priority maps. The current study investigated whether and how reward associations based on spatial location translate from overt eye movements to covert attention. If reward associations can be tied to locations in space, and if overt and covert attention rely on similar overlapping neuronal populations, then both overt and covert attentional measures should display similar spatial-based reward learning. Our results suggest that location- and reward-based changes in one attentional domain do not lead to similar changes in the other. Specifically, although we found similar improvements at differentially rewarded locations during overt attentional learning, this translated to the least improvement at a highly rewarded location during covert attention. We interpret this as the result of an increased motivational link between the high reward location and the trained eye movement response acquired during learning, leading to a relative slowing during covert attention when the eyes remained fixated and the saccade response was suppressed. In a second experiment participants were not required to keep fixated during the covert attention task and we no longer observed relative slowing at the high reward location. Furthermore, the second experiment revealed no covert spatial priority of rewarded locations. We conclude that the transfer of location-based reward associations is intimately linked with the reward-modulated motor response employed during learning, and alternative attentional and task contexts may interfere with learned spatial priorities.

Citing Articles

The who and the where: Attention to identities and locations in groups.

Ma H, Redden R, Hayward D Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 86(5):1816-1832.

PMID: 38724727 PMC: 11557637. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02879-6.


Pavlovian learning in the selection history-dependent control of overt spatial attention.

Anderson B, Liao M, Gregoire L J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022; 48(8):783-789.

PMID: 35737541 PMC: 9547338. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001030.


The past, present, and future of selection history.

Anderson B, Kim H, Kim A, Liao M, Mrkonja L, Clement A Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021; 130:326-350.

PMID: 34499927 PMC: 8511179. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.004.


Awareness is necessary for attentional biases by location-reward association.

Mine C, Yokoyama T, Takeda Y Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021; 83(5):2002-2016.

PMID: 33759117 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02280-7.


Attentional Orienting by Non-informative Cue Is Shaped via Reinforcement Learning.

Cho S, Cho Y Front Psychol. 2020; 10:2884.

PMID: 32010011 PMC: 6974624. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02884.


References
1.
Hoffman J, Subramaniam B . The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Percept Psychophys. 1995; 57(6):787-95. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206794. View

2.
Munoz D, WURTZ R . Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus. I. Characteristics of cell discharge. J Neurophysiol. 1993; 70(2):559-75. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1993.70.2.559. View

3.
Belopolsky A, Theeuwes J . Updating the premotor theory: the allocation of attention is not always accompanied by saccade preparation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012; 38(4):902-14. DOI: 10.1037/a0028662. View

4.
Hikosaka O, Kim H, Yasuda M, Yamamoto S . Basal ganglia circuits for reward value-guided behavior. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2014; 37:289-306. PMC: 4148825. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-013924. View

5.
Theeuwes J . Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010; 135(2):77-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006. View