» Articles » PMID: 29100452

Clinical Significance of MSKCC Nomogram on Guiding the Application of Touch Imprint Cytology and Frozen Section in Intraoperative Assessment of Breast Sentinel Lymph Nodes

Overview
Journal Oncotarget
Specialty Oncology
Date 2017 Nov 5
PMID 29100452
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The widely practiced intra-operative methods for rapid evaluation and detection of sentinel lymph node (SLN) status include frozen section (FS) and touch imprint cytology (TIC). This study optimized the use of TIC and FS in the intra-operative detection of breast SLNs based on the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram. Three hundred forty-two SLNs were removed from 79 patients. SLN metastatic probability was assessed by the MSKCC nomogram. The SLNs underwent intra-operative TIC and FS, as well as routine post-operative paraffin sections (RPSs). The relationships between TIC, FS, and SLN metastatic probability were analyzed. Overall, TIC was more sensitive than FS (92.31% . 76.92%), while TIC specificity was inferior to FS specificity (84.85% . 100%). In addition, the best cut-off value for TIC based on the MSKCC nomogram was inferior to the best FS cut-off value (22.5% . 34.5%). All patients with a MSKCC value <22.5% in the present study were negative based on FS and RPS, while the true-negative and false-positive rates for TIC were 92.5% and 7.5%, respectively. Thus, early breast cancer patients, based on a MSKCC value <22.5%, can safely avoid FS, but should have TIC performed intra-operatively. Patients with a MSKCC value >22.5% should have TIC and FS to determine the size of metastases, whether or not to proceed with axillary lymph node dissection, and to avoid easily missed metastases.

Citing Articles

The diagnostic accuracy of touch imprint cytology for sentinel lymph node metastases of breast cancer: An up-to-date meta-analysis of 4,073 patients.

Yang Q, Hu Y, Hu C, Han Y, Shen H Open Med (Wars). 2023; 18(1):20230827.

PMID: 38025542 PMC: 10655687. DOI: 10.1515/med-2023-0827.


Classification of breast mass lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging by a computer-assisted diagnosis system based on quantitative analysis.

Yin J, Yang J, Jiang Z Oncol Lett. 2019; 17(3):2623-2630.

PMID: 30867727 PMC: 6365960. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.9916.

References
1.
Francz M, Egervari K, Szollosi Z . Intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer: comparison of frozen sections, imprint cytology and immunocytochemistry. Cytopathology. 2010; 22(1):36-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2010.00818.x. View

2.
Chen Y, Zhang J, Chen J, Liu Z, Huang X, Cheng J . Factors associated with the misdiagnosis of sentinel lymph nodes using touch imprint cytology for early stage breast cancer. Oncol Lett. 2012; 2(2):277-281. PMC: 3410592. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2011.233. View

3.
McLaughlin S, Wright M, Morris K, Sampson M, Brockway J, Hurley K . Prevalence of lymphedema in women with breast cancer 5 years after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary dissection: patient perceptions and precautionary behaviors. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(32):5220-6. PMC: 2652092. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3766. View

4.
Creager A, Geisinger K, Shiver S, Perrier N, Shen P, Shaw J . Intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes for metastatic breast carcinoma by imprint cytology. Mod Pathol. 2002; 15(11):1140-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.MP.0000036385.54165.E1. View

5.
Khanna R, Bhadani S, Khanna S, Pandey M, Kumar M . Touch imprint cytology evaluation of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer. World J Surg. 2011; 35(6):1254-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-011-1094-7. View