» Articles » PMID: 29099047

Concept and Evaluation of a New Piezoelectric Transducer for an Implantable Middle Ear Hearing Device

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2017 Nov 4
PMID 29099047
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Implantable middle ear hearing devices (IMEHDs) have been developed as a new technology to overcome the limitations of conventional hearing aids. The piezoelectric cantilever transducers currently used in the IMEHDs have the advantages of low power consumption and ease of fabrication, but generate less high-frequency output. To address this problem, we proposed and designed a new piezoelectric transducer based on a piezoelectric stack for the IMEHD. This new transducer, attached to the incus body with a coupling rod, stimulates the ossicular chain in response to the expansion-and-contraction of its piezoelectric stack. To test its feasibility for hearing loss compensation, a bench testing of the transducer prototype and a temporal bone experiment were conducted, respectively. Bench testing results showed that the new transducer did have a broad frequency bandwidth. Besides, the transducer was found to have a low total harmonic distortion (<0.75%) in all frequencies, and small release time (1 ms). The temporal bone experiment further proved that the transducer has the capability to produce sufficient vibrations to compensate for severe sensorineural hearing loss, especially at high frequencies. This property benefits the treatment of the most common sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. To produce a 100 dB SPL equivalent sound pressure at 1 kHz, its power consumption is 0.49 mW, which is low enough for the transducer to be utilized in the IMEHD.

Citing Articles

Measurements of Small Frequency Differences by Dual Mode 4 MHz Quartz Sensors.

Matko V Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(6).

PMID: 36991928 PMC: 10053742. DOI: 10.3390/s23063220.


Multiple Quartz Crystals Connected in Parallel for High-Resolution Sensing of Capacitance Changes.

Matko V Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(13).

PMID: 35808525 PMC: 9269720. DOI: 10.3390/s22135030.


Sensitivity and Accuracy of Dielectric Measurements of Liquids Significantly Improved by Coupled Capacitive-Dependent Quartz Crystals.

Matko V, Milanovic M Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(10).

PMID: 34065458 PMC: 8160995. DOI: 10.3390/s21103565.


Detection Principles of Temperature Compensated Oscillators with Reactance Influence on Piezoelectric Resonator.

Matko V, Milanovic M Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(3).

PMID: 32024160 PMC: 7038692. DOI: 10.3390/s20030802.


The Influence of Piezoelectric Transducer Stimulating Sites on the Performance of Implantable Middle Ear Hearing Devices: A Numerical Analysis.

Liu H, Zhao Y, Yang J, Rao Z Micromachines (Basel). 2019; 10(11).

PMID: 31739627 PMC: 6915382. DOI: 10.3390/mi10110782.


References
1.
. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015; 386(9995):743-800. PMC: 4561509. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60692-4. View

2.
FREDRICKSON J, Coticchia J, Khosla S . Ongoing investigations into an implantable electromagnetic hearing aid for moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1995; 28(1):107-20. View

3.
Jenkins H, Atkins J, Horlbeck D, Hoffer M, Balough B, Arigo J . U.S. Phase I preliminary results of use of the Otologics MET Fully-Implantable Ossicular Stimulator. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007; 137(2):206-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.03.012. View

4.
Paulick P, Merlo M, Mahboubi H, Djalilian H, Bachman M . A micro-drive hearing aid: a novel non-invasive hearing prosthesis actuator. Biomed Microdevices. 2014; 16(6):915-25. PMC: 4214964. DOI: 10.1007/s10544-014-9896-7. View

5.
Maniglia A, Ko W, Rosenbaum M, Zhu W, Werning J, Belser R . A contactless electromagnetic implantable middle ear device for sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Nose Throat J. 1994; 73(2):78-82, 84-8, 90. View