» Articles » PMID: 29095263

ED50 of Intrathecal Ropivacaine for Cesarean Section Under Prophylactic Infusion of Phenylephrine: A Consort Study

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Nov 3
PMID 29095263
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Studies have reported that prophylactic continuous infusion of phenylephrine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section can decrease the spread of local anesthetics. We investigated the ED50 of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine in parturient women undergoing cesarean section under prophylactic infusion of phenylephrine.

Methods: Sixty parturient women were allocated into 2 groups in this prospective study. Group P received 0.5 mL kg h of phenylephrine (5 mg/50 mL) at the start of intrathecal injection, and Group C (control group) received the same volume of saline. The dose of intrathecal ropivacaine for each subject was decided through up-down allocation method. The initial dose was set as 7.5 mg. Successful anesthesia was defined as the level of T6 or above achieved within 15 minutes after intrathecal injection and no additional epidural drug or venous analgesia to complete operation. The Massey formula was applied to calculate the ED50 of intrathecal ropivacaine in both groups.

Results: The ED50 of hyperbaric ropivacaine determined by up-and-down method was 7.2 mg (95% confidence interval (CI), 6.8-7.6 mg) in the Group P, and 6.8 mg (95% CI, 6.4-7.2 mg) in the Group C, there was significant difference between the 2 groups (P < .5). The ED50 of intrathecal ropivacaine increases compared with Group C when phenylephrine is prophylactic infused to prevent spinal induced hypotension in cesarean section.

Conclusion: The ED50 of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine is 7.2 mg when phenylephrine is prophylactic infused to prevent spinal induced hypotension in cesarean section, and more ropivacaine demands on spinal anesthesia for cesarean section (www.chictr.org.cn, registration number: ChiCTR-RIC-17011650).

Citing Articles

Minimum effective dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine for cesarean section with and without prophylactic norepinephrine infusion: Randomized triple-blinded trial.

Tyagi A, Mathur M, Salhotra R, Rautela R J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2024; 40(3):491-497.

PMID: 39391636 PMC: 11463919. DOI: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_189_23.


Comparing the minimum local anesthetic dose of ropivacaine in real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia and traditional landmark-guided spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial of knee surgery patients.

Zheng T, Zheng C, Yan L, Guo H, You Y, Ye P Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9(19):1492.

PMID: 34805354 PMC: 8573435. DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-3888.


ED50 and ED95 of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine for parturients undergoing cesarean section with prophylactic infusion of phenylephrine: A Prospective dose-finding Study.

Xu W, Xiao F, Zhang Y, Liu L, Chang X Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(50):e13727.

PMID: 30558092 PMC: 6319821. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013727.

References
1.
Cooper D, Gibb S, Meek T, Owen S, Kokri M, Malik A . Effect of intravenous vasopressor on spread of spinal anaesthesia and fetal acid-base equilibrium. Br J Anaesth. 2007; 98(5):649-56. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aem056. View

2.
Ginosar Y, Mirikatani E, Drover D, Cohen S, Riley E . ED50 and ED95 of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine coadministered with opioids for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2004; 100(3):676-82. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200403000-00031. View

3.
Aragao F, Aragao P, Martins C, Filho N, Barroqueiro E . [Comparison of metaraminol, phenylephrine and ephedrine in prophylaxis and treatment of hypotension in cesarean section under spinal anesthesia]. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2014; 64(5):299-306. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjan.2013.07.014. View

4.
Zheng D, Wu G, Qin P, Ji B, Ye L, Shi T . Hyperbaric spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine coadministered with sufentanil for cesarean delivery: a dose-response study. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8(4):5739-45. PMC: 4483882. View

5.
Khaw K, Kee W, Wong M, Ng F, Lee A . Spinal ropivacaine for cesarean delivery: a comparison of hyperbaric and plain solutions. Anesth Analg. 2002; 94(3):680-5; table of contents. DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200203000-00037. View