» Articles » PMID: 29095254

Bibliometric Analysis of the Top-cited Articles on Islet Transplantation

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Nov 3
PMID 29095254
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: To identify and characterize the top-cited articles in the field of islet transplantation.

Methods: We used the Science Citation Index Expanded database to identify the most frequently cited articles published after 1900. Articles were evaluated using the following characteristics: citation number, publication year, study design, references, country and institution of origin, authorship, and journal. Keyword analysis and citation networks were used to analyze research trends.

Results: The most frequently cited articles received between 146 and 2988 citations; the median was 291. All of the most frequently cited articles were published between 1972 and 2012, and 85 articles were published after 1990. The most popular study design involved basic science (75 articles). The leading countries were the United States (US) and Canada, and the leading institutions were the University of Alberta, Canada, and the University of Minnesota, in the US. Journals specializing in diabetes or transplantation published more than half of the articles (n = 53, 52%), with the journal Diabetes publishing the largest number (n = 30). No association was found between a journal's impact factor and the number of top-cited articles it published. There was no correlation between the number of citations and the number of years since publication, authors, participating institutions, or countries involved. Top-cited articles focused on 2 themes: the use of antirejection immunotherapy or biocompatible encapsulations to prolong graft survival, and assessments of the efficacy of islet transplants, in particular, islet allografts.

Conclusions: Our study can help researchers to identify and decipher the characteristics of top-cited articles in the field of islet transplantation. Just as clinically successful allografts are carried out using the Edmonton protocol, autografts and xenografts should be similarly strengthened to solve problems relating to immune rejection and islet sources, respectively.

Citing Articles

Research on aerobic fitness in children and adolescents: a bibliometric analysis based on the 100 most-cited articles.

Xia R, Yang L, Liang C, Lyu D, Zang W, Sun G Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1409532.

PMID: 39386747 PMC: 11461214. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1409532.


The 100 top-cited articles on scrub typhus: a bibliometric analysis.

Musa T, Li W, Kawuki J, Wei P Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2021; 12(2):126-135.

PMID: 33980003 PMC: 8102874. DOI: 10.24171/j.phrp.2021.12.2.10.


The Most-Cited Authors Who Published Papers in JMIR mHealth and uHealth Using the Authorship-Weighted Scheme: Bibliometric Analysis.

Kan W, Chou W, Chien T, Yeh Y, Chou P JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020; 8(5):e11567.

PMID: 32379053 PMC: 7319608. DOI: 10.2196/11567.


Whether productive authors using the national health insurance database also achieve higher individual research metrics: A bibliometric study.

Hsieh W, Chien T, Kuo S, Lin H Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(2):e18631.

PMID: 31914046 PMC: 6959956. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018631.


Bibliometric analysis of research on the trends in autophagy.

Hong T, Feng X, Tong W, Xu W PeerJ. 2019; 7:e7103.

PMID: 31205825 PMC: 6556104. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7103.


References
1.
Guariguata L, Whiting D, Hambleton I, Beagley J, Linnenkamp U, Shaw J . Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014; 103(2):137-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.002. View

2.
Garfield E . Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science. 1972; 178(4060):471-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.178.4060.471. View

3.
Callaham M, Wears R, Weber E . Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. JAMA. 2002; 287(21):2847-50. DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2847. View

4.
Schoonbaert D, Roelants G . Citation analysis for measuring the value of scientific publications: quality assessment tool or comedy of errors?. Trop Med Int Health. 1996; 1(6):739-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.1996.tb00106.x. View

5.
Zhao X, Guo L, Lin Y, Wang H, Gu C, Zhao L . The top 100 most cited scientific reports focused on diabetes research. Acta Diabetol. 2015; 53(1):13-26. DOI: 10.1007/s00592-015-0813-1. View