» Articles » PMID: 29092611

Modeling Signal Propagation in the Human Cochlea

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2017 Nov 3
PMID 29092611
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The level-dependent component of the latency of human auditory brainstem responses (ABR) to tonebursts decreases by about 38% for every 20-dB increase in stimulus level over a wide range of both frequency and level [Neely, Norton, Gorga, and Jesteadt (1998). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 31, 87-97]. This level-dependence has now been simulated in an active, nonlinear, transmission-line model of cochlear mechanics combined with an adaptation stage. The micromechanics in this model are similar to previous models except that a dual role is proposed for the tectorial membrane (TM): (1) passive sharpening the tuning of sensory-cell inputs (relative to basilar-membrane vibrations) and (2) providing an optimal phase shift (relative to basilar-membrane vibrations) of outer-hair-cell feedback forces, so that amplification is restricted to a limited range of frequencies. The adaptation stage, which represents synaptic adaptation of neural signals, contributes to the latency level-dependence more at low frequencies than at high frequencies. Compression in this model spans the range of audible sound levels with a compression ratio of about 2:1. With further development, the proposed model of cochlear micromechanics could be useful both (1) as a front-end to functional models of the auditory system and (2) as a foundation for understanding the physiological basis of cochlear amplification.

Citing Articles

Nonlinear cochlear mechanics without direct vibration-amplification feedback.

Altoe A, Shera C Phys Rev Res. 2021; 2(1).

PMID: 33403361 PMC: 7781069. DOI: 10.1103/physrevresearch.2.013218.


Constraints imposed by zero-crossing invariance on cochlear models with two mechanical degrees of freedom.

Sisto R, Shera C, Altoe A, Moleti A J Acoust Soc Am. 2019; 146(3):1685.

PMID: 31590512 PMC: 6756920. DOI: 10.1121/1.5126514.


A canonical oscillator model of cochlear dynamics.

Lerud K, Kim J, Almonte F, Carney L, Large E Hear Res. 2019; 380:100-107.

PMID: 31234108 PMC: 6669083. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.06.001.

References
1.
Rhode W, Recio A . Study of mechanical motions in the basal region of the chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000; 107(6):3317-32. DOI: 10.1121/1.429404. View

2.
Meddis R, OMard L, Lopez-Poveda E . A computational algorithm for computing nonlinear auditory frequency selectivity. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001; 109(6):2852-61. DOI: 10.1121/1.1370357. View

3.
Shera C, Guinan Jr J, Oxenham A . Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(5):3318-23. PMC: 122516. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.032675099. View

4.
Zweig G, Lipes R, Pierce J . The cochlear compromise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1976; 59(4):975-82. DOI: 10.1121/1.380956. View

5.
Neely S, Gorga M, Dorn P . Cochlear compression estimates from measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003; 114(3):1499-507. DOI: 10.1121/1.1604122. View