» Articles » PMID: 29091799

Molecular Classification Substitutes for the Prognostic Variables Stage, Age, and MYCN Status in Neuroblastoma Risk Assessment

Overview
Journal Neoplasia
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Oncology
Date 2017 Nov 2
PMID 29091799
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Current risk stratification systems for neuroblastoma patients consider clinical, histopathological, and genetic variables, and additional prognostic markers have been proposed in recent years. We here sought to select highly informative covariates in a multistep strategy based on consecutive Cox regression models, resulting in a risk score that integrates hazard ratios of prognostic variables.

Methods: A cohort of 695 neuroblastoma patients was divided into a discovery set (n=75) for multigene predictor generation, a training set (n=411) for risk score development, and a validation set (n=209). Relevant prognostic variables were identified by stepwise multivariable L1-penalized least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression, followed by backward selection in multivariable Cox regression, and then integrated into a novel risk score.

Results: The variables stage, age, MYCN status, and two multigene predictors, NB-th24 and NB-th44, were selected as independent prognostic markers by LASSO Cox regression analysis. Following backward selection, only the multigene predictors were retained in the final model. Integration of these classifiers in a risk scoring system distinguished three patient subgroups that differed substantially in their outcome. The scoring system discriminated patients with diverging outcome in the validation cohort (5-year event-free survival, 84.9±3.4 vs 63.6±14.5 vs 31.0±5.4; P<.001), and its prognostic value was validated by multivariable analysis.

Conclusion: We here propose a translational strategy for developing risk assessment systems based on hazard ratios of relevant prognostic variables. Our final neuroblastoma risk score comprised two multigene predictors only, supporting the notion that molecular properties of the tumor cells strongly impact clinical courses of neuroblastoma patients.

Citing Articles

Genetic Risk Profiling Reveals Altered Glycosyltransferase Expression as a Predictor for Patient Outcome in Neuroblastoma.

Bley I, Behrens S, Spohn M, Muller I, Schattling B J Clin Med. 2025; 14(2.

PMID: 39860532 PMC: 11766279. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020527.


Identification of MYCN non-amplified neuroblastoma subgroups points towards molecular signatures for precision prognosis and therapy stratification.

Hu X, Zhou Y, Hill C, Chen K, Cheng C, Liu X Br J Cancer. 2024; 130(11):1841-1854.

PMID: 38553589 PMC: 7616008. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02666-y.


Identification of a novel gene signature for neuroblastoma differentiation using a Boolean implication network.

Zage P, Huo Y, Subramonian D, Le Clorennec C, Ghosh P, Sahoo D Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2023; 62(6):313-331.

PMID: 36680522 PMC: 10257350. DOI: 10.1002/gcc.23124.


Comparative epigenomics by machine learning approach for neuroblastoma.

Sugino R, Ohira M, Mansai S, Kamijo T BMC Genomics. 2022; 23(1):852.

PMID: 36572864 PMC: 9793522. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-022-09061-y.


Characterization of m6A-related lncRNA signature in neuroblastoma.

Li L, Chen S, Li J, Rong G, Yang J, Li Y Front Pediatr. 2022; 10:927885.

PMID: 36324814 PMC: 9618704. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.927885.


References
1.
Molenaar J, Koster J, Zwijnenburg D, van Sluis P, Valentijn L, van der Ploeg I . Sequencing of neuroblastoma identifies chromothripsis and defects in neuritogenesis genes. Nature. 2012; 483(7391):589-93. DOI: 10.1038/nature10910. View

2.
Attiyeh E, London W, Mosse Y, Wang Q, Winter C, Khazi D . Chromosome 1p and 11q deletions and outcome in neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353(21):2243-53. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa052399. View

3.
Brodeur G, Seeger R, Schwab M, Varmus H, Bishop J . Amplification of N-myc in untreated human neuroblastomas correlates with advanced disease stage. Science. 1984; 224(4653):1121-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.6719137. View

4.
Maris J . Recent advances in neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(23):2202-11. PMC: 3306838. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra0804577. View

5.
Ohira M, Oba S, Nakamura Y, Isogai E, Kaneko S, Nakagawa A . Expression profiling using a tumor-specific cDNA microarray predicts the prognosis of intermediate risk neuroblastomas. Cancer Cell. 2005; 7(4):337-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.03.019. View