» Articles » PMID: 29089314

Three-Year Outcomes With the Absorb Bioresorbable Scaffold: Individual-Patient-Data Meta-Analysis From the ABSORB Randomized Trials

Overview
Journal Circulation
Date 2017 Nov 2
PMID 29089314
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) completely resorbs within 3 years after coronary artery implantation. The safety and effectiveness of BVS through this critical 3-year period have not been characterized.

Methods: We performed an individual-patient-data pooled meta-analysis of the 4 randomized ABSORB trials in which 3389 patients with coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to everolimus-eluting Absorb BVS (n=2164) or cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (n=1225). The primary efficacy outcome measure was target lesion failure (cardiac mortality, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization), and the primary safety outcome measure was device thrombosis.

Results: BVS compared with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents resulted in higher 3-year rates of target lesion failure (11.7% versus 8.1%; risk ratio [RR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.73; =0.006), driven by greater target vessel myocardial infarction (7.8% versus 4.2%; RR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.26-2.35; =0.0006) and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (6.6% versus 4.4%; RR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.05-1.98; =0.02), with comparable cardiac mortality (1.1% versus 1.1%; RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.47-1.88; =0.85). Device thrombosis rates through 3 years were also higher with BVS (2.4% versus 0.6%; RR, 3.71; 95% CI, 1.70-8.11; =0.001). Between 1 and 3 years, target lesion failure rates (6.1% versus 3.9%; =0.02) and device thrombosis rates (1.1% versus 0.0%; <0.0001) were higher with BVS than cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents.

Conclusions: In the present individual-patient-data pooled meta-analysis of the ABSORB trials, BVS was associated with increased rates of target lesion failure and device thrombosis between 1 and 3 years and cumulatively through 3 years of follow-up compared with everolimus-eluting stents.

Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01751906, NCT01844284, NCT01923740, and NCT01425281.

Citing Articles

Biodegradable Stents in the Treatment of Arterial Stenosis.

Dinc R, Ekingen E J Clin Med. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39860538 PMC: 11765601. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020532.


A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Bioresorbable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents versus Fully Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stenting.

Wiebe J, Byrne R, Bradaric C, Kuna C, Kessler T, Pfleiderer M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(19).

PMID: 39408009 PMC: 11478066. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13195949.


Ten-year clinical outcomes of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents vs. everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds-insights from the EVERBIO-2 trial.

Bengueddache S, Cook M, Lehmann S, Arroyo D, Togni M, Puricel S Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1426348.

PMID: 39323753 PMC: 11423422. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1426348.


Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Below-the-Knee Arterial Disease: A Literature Review of New Developments.

Cui H, Wu Y Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 25(4):133.

PMID: 39076564 PMC: 11264025. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2504133.


Accelerated degradation testing impacts the degradation processes in 3D printed amorphous PLLA.

Malone L, Best S, Cameron R Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1419654.

PMID: 39036561 PMC: 11257899. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1419654.