» Articles » PMID: 29089103

The Feasibility of an Air Purifier and Secondhand Smoke Education Intervention in Homes of Inner City Pregnant Women and Infants Living with a Smoker

Overview
Journal Environ Res
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2017 Nov 2
PMID 29089103
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Secondhand smoke (SHS) and other air pollutants adversely affect the health of pregnant women and infants. A feasibility study aimed at reducing air pollution in homes of pregnant women or infants living with a smoker was completed.

Methods: In collaboration with the Baltimore City Health Department, women ≥ 18 years of age and either pregnant nonsmokers, or post-partum (any smoking status) with an infant age 0-12 months were recruited. Homes had at least one smoker. Intervention included two air purifiers and secondhand smoke education. Outcomes included feasibility, change in fine particulate matter (PM), air nicotine, and salivary cotinine pre- and post-intervention.

Results: Fifty women were enrolled (mean age 27 years, 92% African American, 71% single, 94% Medicaid eligible, 34% reported smoking) and 86% completed the study. Of the 50 women, 32 had infants and 18 were pregnant at time of enrollment. Post- intervention, 70% of participants reported smokers were less likely to smoke indoors, and 77% had at least one air purifier turned on at the final visit. Participant satisfaction was high (91%) and 98% would recommend air purifiers. Indoor PM was significantly decreased (P < 0.001). Salivary cotinine was significantly decreased for non-smoking women (P < 0.01) but not infants, and no significant change in air nicotine occurred (P = 0.6).

Conclusions: Air purifiers with SHS education is a feasible intervention in homes of women and infants. These data demonstrate reduction in indoor PM and salivary cotinine in non-smoking adults. Air purifiers are not an alternative for smoking cessation and a home/ car smoking ban. Smoking cessation should be strongly encouraged for all pregnant women, and nonsmoking mothers with infants should be counseled to completely avoid SHS exposure. This study provides support for a future intervention evaluating clinical endpoints.

Citing Articles

Bronchiolitis recovery and the use of High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) Filters (The BREATHE Study): study protocol for a multi-center, parallel, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial.

Cowan K, Semmens E, Lee J, Walker E, Smith P, Fu L Trials. 2024; 25(1):197.

PMID: 38504367 PMC: 10953277. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08012-0.


Involuntary tobacco smoke exposures from conception to 18 years increase midlife cardiometabolic disease risk: a 40-year longitudinal study.

Niu Z, Mu L, Buka S, Loucks E, Wang M, Tian L J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2024; 14(6):689-698.

PMID: 38186328 PMC: 10984799. DOI: 10.1017/S2040174423000375.


Place-Based Strategies Addressing Neighborhood Environments to Improve Perinatal and Preterm Infant Outcomes.

Nelin T, Scott K, Just A, Burris H Children (Basel). 2023; 10(10).

PMID: 37892309 PMC: 10605196. DOI: 10.3390/children10101646.


Demonstration and Suggestion on the Communication Efficiency of New Media of Environmental Education Based on Ideological and Political Education.

Ren H, Zhao L Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(2).

PMID: 36674324 PMC: 9863358. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20021569.


Second-hand Smoke Exposure Among Home Care Workers (HCWs) in Scotland.

Dobson R, ODonnell R, McGibbon M, Semple S Ann Work Expo Health. 2022; 67(2):208-215.

PMID: 36189955 PMC: 9923038. DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxac066.


References
1.
Hoehn J, Riekert K, Borrelli B, Rand C, Eakin M . Barriers and motivators to reducing secondhand smoke exposure in African American families of head start children: a qualitative study. Health Educ Res. 2016; 31(4):450-64. PMC: 4945858. DOI: 10.1093/her/cyw028. View

2.
Blaakman S, Borrelli B, Wiesenthal E, Fagnano M, Tremblay P, Stevens T . Secondhand Smoke Exposure Reduction After NICU Discharge: Results of a Randomized Trial. Acad Pediatr. 2015; 15(6):605-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.05.001. View

3.
Simons E, Curtin-Brosnan J, Buckley T, Breysse P, Eggleston P . Indoor environmental differences between inner city and suburban homes of children with asthma. J Urban Health. 2007; 84(4):577-90. PMC: 2219555. DOI: 10.1007/s11524-007-9205-3. View

4.
Jedrychowski W, Perera F, Spengler J, Mroz E, Stigter L, Flak E . Intrauterine exposure to fine particulate matter as a risk factor for increased susceptibility to acute broncho-pulmonary infections in early childhood. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2013; 216(4):395-401. PMC: 3657308. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.12.014. View

5.
Breysse P, Buckley T, Williams D, Beck C, Jo S, Merriman B . Indoor exposures to air pollutants and allergens in the homes of asthmatic children in inner-city Baltimore. Environ Res. 2005; 98(2):167-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2004.07.018. View