» Articles » PMID: 2908700

Effect of Propranolol on Ventricular Repolarization and Refractoriness: Role of Beta-blockade Versus Direct Membrane Effects

Overview
Date 1988 Mar 1
PMID 2908700
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to define the role of beta-adrenergic blockade and direct membrane effects in the ability of dl-propranolol to alter ventricular repolarization and refractoriness in the intact heart. The effective refractory period (ERP) and the local Q-T interval were measured at an epicardial site in the left ventricle in 14 open-chest dogs anesthetized with alpha-chloralose. Beta-adrenergic influences were eliminated in seven dogs (group 1) by stellate transection and nadolol (0.5 mg/kg IV), and enhanced in seven dogs (group 2) by stellate transection and stimulation of the left ansae subclavia. Each dog received an initial beta-blocking dose of propranolol (0.5 mg/kg) followed by a second, cumulative dose of 5.0 mg/kg. In group 1 dogs, there was no significant change in either the ERP or local Q-T interval in response to the first dose of propranolol. In group 2 dogs, left stellate stimulation significantly shortened the ERP (20 +/- 2 msec) and the local Q-T interval (17 +/- 4 msec). The first dose of propranolol prolonged these parameters to values not different from prestimulation control values. There was no change in the H-V interval, QRS complex duration, or diastolic threshold (DT) in either group after the initial propranolol dose. The second dose of propranolol significantly shortened the ERP (5 +/- 1 msec) and the local Q-T interval (11 +/- 2 msec) in both groups. This dose also significantly increased the DT, H-V interval, and QRS complex duration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Citing Articles

Cardiac effects of chronic oral beta-blockade: lack of agreement between heart rate and QT interval changes.

Extramiana F, Maison-Blanche P, Tavernier R, Jordaens L, Leenhardt A, Coumel P Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2002; 7(4):379-88.

PMID: 12431318 PMC: 7027610. DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-474x.2002.tb00189.x.

References
1.
Hayes A, Cooper R . Studies on the absorption, distribution and excretion of propranolol in rat, dog and monkey. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1971; 176(2):302-11. View

2.
LEVY M, Ng M, ZIESKE H . Functional distribution of the peripheral cardiac sympathetic pathways. Circ Res. 1966; 19(3):650-61. DOI: 10.1161/01.res.19.3.650. View

3.
Brorson L, Reele S, Dupont W, Woosley R, Shand D, Smith R . Effects of concentration and steric configuration of propranolol on AV conduction and ventricular repolarization in the dog. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1981; 3(4):692-703. DOI: 10.1097/00005344-198107000-00004. View

4.
Lee R, Evans D, Baky S, LAFFAN R . Pharmacology of nadolol (SQ 11725), a beta-adrenergic antagonist lacking direct myocardial depression. Eur J Pharmacol. 1975; 33(2):371-82. DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(75)90182-x. View

5.
Martins J, Zipes D, Lund D . Distribution of local repolarization changes produced by efferent vagal stimulation in the canine ventricles. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983; 2(6):1191-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(83)80350-7. View