» Articles » PMID: 29081563

Comparison of Reduced Models for Blood Flow Using Runge-Kutta Discontinuous Galerkin Methods

Overview
Journal Appl Numer Math
Date 2017 Oct 31
PMID 29081563
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One-dimensional blood flow models take the general form of nonlinear hyperbolic systems but differ in their formulation. One class of models considers the physically conserved quantities of mass and momentum, while another class describes mass and velocity. Further, the averaging process employed in the model derivation requires the specification of the axial velocity profile; this choice differentiates models within each class. Discrepancies among differing models have yet to be investigated. In this paper, we comment on some theoretical differences among models and systematically compare them for physiologically relevant vessel parameters, network topology, and boundary data. In particular, the effect of the velocity profile is investigated in the cases of both smooth and discontinuous solutions, and a recommendation for a physiological model is provided. The models are discretized by a class of Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin methods.

Citing Articles

1D Thermoembolization Model Using CT Imaging Data for Porcine Liver.

Amare R, Stolley D, Parrish S, Jacobsen M, Layman R, Santos C ArXiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39314502 PMC: 11419193.


[Angiodynamic and optical coupling analysis of skin tissue model under finite pressure].

Zhao H, Zhou L, Liu Z, Qiao W, Sun X, Jiang L Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2022; 39(3):527-536.

PMID: 35788522 PMC: 10950771. DOI: 10.7507/1001-5515.202106039.

References
1.
Zhang H, Fujiwara N, Kobayashi M, Yamada S, Liang F, Takagi S . Development of a Numerical Method for Patient-Specific Cerebral Circulation Using 1D-0D Simulation of the Entire Cardiovascular System with SPECT Data. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016; 44(8):2351-2363. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-015-1544-8. View

2.
Azer K, Peskin C . A one-dimensional model of blood flow in arteries with friction and convection based on the Womersley velocity profile. Cardiovasc Eng. 2007; 7(2):51-73. DOI: 10.1007/s10558-007-9031-y. View

3.
Olufsen M, Peskin C, Kim W, Pedersen E, Nadim A, Larsen J . Numerical simulation and experimental validation of blood flow in arteries with structured-tree outflow conditions. Ann Biomed Eng. 2001; 28(11):1281-99. DOI: 10.1114/1.1326031. View

4.
Stergiopulos N, Young D, Rogge T . Computer simulation of arterial flow with applications to arterial and aortic stenoses. J Biomech. 1992; 25(12):1477-88. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90060-e. View

5.
Xiao N, Alastruey J, Figueroa C . A systematic comparison between 1-D and 3-D hemodynamics in compliant arterial models. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2013; 30(2):204-31. PMC: 4337249. DOI: 10.1002/cnm.2598. View