» Articles » PMID: 29079599

Predictive Value of Minimal Residual Disease in Philadelphia-chromosome-positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated with Imatinib in the European Intergroup Study of Post-induction Treatment of Philadelphia-chromosome-positive Acute Lymphoblastic...

Abstract

The prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) in Philadelphia-chromosome-positive (Ph+) childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors is not fully established. We detected MRD by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) of rearranged immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor genes (IG/TR) and/or BCR/ABL1 fusion transcript to investigate its predictive value in patients receiving Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (BFM) high-risk (HR) therapy and post-induction intermittent imatinib (the European intergroup study of post-induction treatment of Philadelphia-chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (EsPhALL) study). MRD was monitored after induction (time point (TP)1), consolidation Phase IB (TP2), HR Blocks, reinductions, and at the end of therapy. MRD negativity progressively increased over time, both by IG/TR and BCR/ABL1. Of 90 patients with IG/TR MRD at TP1, nine were negative and none relapsed, while 11 with MRD<5×10 and 70 with MRD≥5×10 had a comparable 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse of 36.4 (15.4) and 35.2 (5.9), respectively. Patients who achieved MRD negativity at TP2 had a low relapse risk (5-yr cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR)=14.3[9.8]), whereas those who attained MRD negativity at a later date showed higher CIR, comparable to patients with positive MRD at any level. BCR/ABL1 MRD negative patients at TP1 had a relapse risk similar to those who were IG/TR MRD negative (1/8 relapses). The overall concordance between the two methods is 69%, with significantly higher positivity by BCR/ABL1. In conclusion, MRD monitoring by both methods may be functional not only for measuring response but also for guiding biological studies aimed at investigating causes for discrepancies, although from our data IG/TR MRD monitoring appears to be more reliable. Early MRD negativity is highly predictive of favorable outcome. The earlier MRD negativity is achieved, the better the prognosis.

Citing Articles

[The progress in classification and prognosis evaluation of BCR::ABL1 positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia].

Yan Y, Wang C, Mi J, Wang J Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2024; 45(7):705-710.

PMID: 39231779 PMC: 11388118. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20240315-00096.


Prediction of Response to FDA-Approved Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL).

Khawaji Z, Khawaji N, Alahmadi M, Elmoneim A Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2024; 25(9):1163-1183.

PMID: 39102166 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01237-w.


MRD in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive ALL: Methodologies and Clinical Implications.

Tran V, Salafian K, Michaels K, Jones C, Reed D, Keng M Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2024; 19(4):186-196.

PMID: 38888822 PMC: 11316691. DOI: 10.1007/s11899-024-00736-9.


Minimal residual disease monitoring in childhood Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: prognostic significance and correlation between multiparameter flow cytometry and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Li J, Lu A, Gao Y, Wan Y, Wang J, Zhang J Haematologica. 2024; 109(12):4089-4094.

PMID: 38695139 PMC: 11609813. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2024.285119.


Multilineage involvement in KMT2A-rearranged B acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: cell-of-origin, biology, and clinical implications.

Aypar U, Dilip D, Gadde R, Londono D, Liu Y, Gao Q Histopathology. 2024; 85(2):310-316.

PMID: 38686611 PMC: 11246803. DOI: 10.1111/his.15203.


References
1.
Lee S, Kim D, Cho B, Kim Y, Kim Y, Hwang J . Risk factors for adults with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in remission treated with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: the potential of real-time quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. Br J Haematol. 2002; 120(1):145-53. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.03988.x. View

2.
Schultz K, Bowman W, Aledo A, Slayton W, Sather H, Devidas M . Improved early event-free survival with imatinib in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a children's oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(31):5175-81. PMC: 2773475. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.2514. View

3.
Stirewalt D, Guthrie K, Beppu L, Bryant E, Doney K, Gooley T . Predictors of relapse and overall survival in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia after transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2003; 9(3):206-12. DOI: 10.1053/bbmt.2003.50025. View

4.
Hovorkova L, Zaliova M, Venn N, Bleckmann K, Trkova M, Potuckova E . Monitoring of childhood ALL using genomic breakpoints identifies a subgroup with CML-like biology. Blood. 2017; 129(20):2771-2781. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-11-749978. View

5.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View