» Articles » PMID: 29078774

The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale: Translation and Validation of an Arabic Version

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2017 Oct 29
PMID 29078774
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale has been widely used in assessing psychological distress among general and clinical populations from different cultural backgrounds. To our knowledge, however, researchers have not yet validated any translated versions in Arabic. The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of Arabic translations of the ten item (K10) and six item (K6) versions among public sector employees in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

Methods: As part of a larger research project on life satisfaction, researchers collected data from 234 Palestinian social workers in June and July of 2016. The survey included several mental health measures, including the K10, which were translated from English to Arabic by an experienced language expert. In the current study, we tested reliability by measuring internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Next, we assessed factor structure using variance-covariance matrix with maximum likelihood estimation. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to examine three competing models: unidimensional K10 model, unidimensional K6 model and two-factor K6 model. Fit indices and parameter estimates were reported. Last, convergent validity was examined by assessing correlations with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) and Somatic Symptoms Scale (SSS-8).

Results: The mean scores for the K6 and K10 were, respectively, 12.87 (SD = 4.02) and 21.8 (SD = 6.7), indicative of mild to moderate levels of distress. Scale reliability analysis showed satisfactory results on both K6 and K10 versions (Cronbach's α = .81 (K6) and .88 (K10)). Among three competing models, the two-factor K6 scale demonstrated the best model fit with high factorial correlations (r = .60, p < .001). Moreover, the K6 has high convergent validity with GAD-7 (r = .66, p < .001) and SSS-8 (r = .61, p < .001).

Conclusion: Results indicated that the translated version of the two-factor K6 scale is a valid and reliable measurement of psychological distress. Our findings suggest that practitioners and researchers can use this instrument in screening and assessing psychological symptoms with Arabic-speaking populations.

Citing Articles

Burden of hidden migraine among the Arab general population: a cross-sectional study.

Elzayat M, Kassab S, Nada M, El-Gilany A J Headache Pain. 2025; 26(1):45.

PMID: 40016663 PMC: 11866620. DOI: 10.1186/s10194-025-01974-9.


Evaluation of a Guided Chatbot Intervention for Young People in Jordan: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.

de Graaff A, Habashneh R, Fanatseh S, Keyan D, Akhtar A, Abualhaija A JMIR Ment Health. 2025; 12:e63515.

PMID: 39908538 PMC: 11840361. DOI: 10.2196/63515.


Psychometric Properties and Network Analysis of the Arabic Version of Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality Scale-Short Version in Patients with Anxiety Disorders.

Abdelrahman R, Fakhrou A, Moussa M, Roshan M Psychiatr Q. 2025; .

PMID: 39821541 DOI: 10.1007/s11126-024-10109-3.


Does socioeconomic factors and child behavior contribute to caregiver's stress in families of children with disabilities in Jordan: A cross-sectional study.

AlHeresh R, Ko J, Vo T, Young M, Hillegass S, Bakhsh H Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(48):e40744.

PMID: 39612425 PMC: 11608666. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040744.


Validity of the Kessler Psychological Distress scale in Brazilian higher education students.

Perrelli J, Vasconcelos G, Correia E Sa J, Medeiros P, Uchoa R, Sanchez Z Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2024; 32:e4254.

PMID: 39607173 PMC: 11654030. DOI: 10.1590/1518-8345.7073.4254.


References
1.
Min J, Lee S . Validation of the K6/K10 Scales of Psychological Distress and Their Optimal Cutoff Scores for Older Koreans. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2015; 80(3):264-82. DOI: 10.1177/0091415015590316. View

2.
Al-Turkait F, Ohaeri J . Exploratory factor analytical study of depressive symptomatology: an Arab experience with a sample comprising college students, using the revised Beck Depression Inventory. Ann Saudi Med. 2011; 32(1):19-26. PMC: 6087643. DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2012.19. View

3.
Furukawa T, Kessler R, Slade T, Andrews G . The performance of the K6 and K10 screening scales for psychological distress in the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being. Psychol Med. 2003; 33(2):357-62. DOI: 10.1017/s0033291702006700. View

4.
Fassaert T, de Wit M, Tuinebreijer W, Wouters H, Verhoeff A, Beekman A . Psychometric properties of an interviewer-administered version of the Kessler Psychological Distress scale (K10) among Dutch, Moroccan and Turkish respondents. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2009; 18(3):159-68. PMC: 6878421. DOI: 10.1002/mpr.288. View

5.
Hinton D, Lewis-Fernandez R . Idioms of distress among trauma survivors: subtypes and clinical utility. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2010; 34(2):209-18. DOI: 10.1007/s11013-010-9175-x. View