» Articles » PMID: 29077943

Effects of Dietary Lactobacillus Rhamnosus CF Supplementation on Growth, Meat Quality, and Microenvironment in Specific Pathogen-free Chickens

Overview
Journal Poult Sci
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2017 Oct 28
PMID 29077943
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The probiotic effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain CF (Chen Fu) on growth performance, meat quality, and microenvironment in specific pathogen-free (SPF) chickens were investigated and compared with Enterococcus faecium. One-hundred-eighty 7-day-old SPF chickens were randomly assigned into 3 groups with 3 replicate pens of 20 chickens each. Group 1 served as a control that was fed a basal diet without probiotics supplementation. Groups 2 and 3 were fed the basal diet supplemented with L. rhamnosus CF and E. faecium, respectively. On d 12 and 24, BW, ADG, feed conversion ratio (FCR), dressing percentage (DP), and apparent digestibility of crude protein (AD-CP) were calculated. Meat color, fat content, shear force, water content, and pH value of breast and thigh muscles; ammonia, urea nitrogen, and uric acid content in plasma; pH value, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, and E. coli in ceca; and ammonia emission were determined. Compared with group 1, group 2 exhibited higher BW, ADG, AD-CP, DP, cecal Lactobacilli, and muscle fat content (P < 0.05) as well as lower FCR, muscle water content, plasma ammonia, pH value, E. coli, and Enterococcus in ceca, and ammonia emission (P < 0.05), and group 3 exhibited higher BW, ADG, AD-CP, DP, and muscle fat content (P < 0.05), as well as lower FCR, meat color, plasma ammonia, E. coli and Enterococcus in ceca, and ammonia emission (d 24) (P < 0.05). Compared with group 3, group 2 exhibited lower plasma ammonia level, E. coli, and pH value in ceca and ammonia emission (P < 0.05) and higher AD-CP, meat color, pH value in thigh muscles, fat content in breast muscles, and number of Lactobacillus in ceca (P < 0.05). Thus, L. rhamnosus CF improves growth performance, meat quality, and microenvironment and is a potential probiotic additive in chickens.

Citing Articles

Effects of and on the duodenal development of specific-pathogen-free broiler chickens.

Eglite S, Jonova S, Gorbacevska D, Zolovs M, Ilgaza A Vet World. 2025; 17(11):2517-2526.

PMID: 39829668 PMC: 11736360. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2024.2517-2526.


Lactic Acid Bacteria Surface Proteins in the Mechanisms of Cell Adhesion and Immunoregulation.

Meng Z, Huang X, Qiao M, Song L, Liu Y, Hai D Food Sci Nutr. 2024; 12(12):10148-10163.

PMID: 39723039 PMC: 11666997. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.4517.


Partial replacement of soybean with local alternative sources: effects on behavior, cecal microbiota, and intestinal histomorphometry of local chickens.

Ozkan S, Bay V, Acar M, Yalcin S Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1463301.

PMID: 39606663 PMC: 11599255. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1463301.


Effect of supplementation with GG powder on intestinal and liver damage in broiler chickens challenged by lipopolysaccharide.

Zhang X, Sun L, Wu M, Yu C, Zhao D, Wang L Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1466274.

PMID: 39534507 PMC: 11555397. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1466274.


Insights into the evaluation, influential factors and improvement strategies for poultry meat quality: a review.

Yue K, Cao Q, Shaukat A, Zhang C, Huang S NPJ Sci Food. 2024; 8(1):62.

PMID: 39251637 PMC: 11385947. DOI: 10.1038/s41538-024-00306-6.