Areas and Factors Associated with Patients' Dissatisfaction with Glaucoma Care

Overview

Journal Clin Ophthalmol

Publisher Dove Medical Press

Specialty Ophthalmology

Date 2017 Oct 28

PMID 29075097

Citations 2

Authors

Valencia Hui Xian Foo

Sarah En Mei Tan

David Ziyou Chen

Shamira A Perera

Charumathi Sabayanagam

Eva Katie Fenwick

Tina T Wong

Ecosse L Lamoureux

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' dissatisfaction with overall and specific aspects of a tertiary glaucoma service and to determine their independent factors, including intraocular pressure (IOP) and visual acuity (VA).

Methods: Patients, aged ≥21 years, from a specialist glaucoma service in a tertiary eye hospital in Singapore for at least 6 months, were recruited for this cross-sectional study between March and June 2014. All consenting patients completed a 7-area glaucoma-specific satisfaction questionnaire and one item related to satisfaction with overall glaucoma care. We determined the top three areas of dissatisfaction and overall dissatisfaction with the glaucoma service. We also explored the independent factors associated with overall and specific areas of patients' dissatisfaction with their glaucoma care, including VA and IOP by using logistic regression models.

Results: Of the 518 patients recruited, 438 (84.6%) patients completed the study. Patients' dissatisfaction with the overall glaucoma service was 7.5%. The three areas of glaucoma service with the highest dissatisfaction rates were as follows: 1) explanation of test results (24.8%); 2) explanation of glaucoma complications (23.7%); and 3) advice on managing glaucoma (23.5%). Patients who were dissatisfied with the overall service had a worse mean VA compared with satisfied patients (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution =0.41±0.43 vs 0.27±0.49, =0.005), whereas mean IOP remained well-controlled in both the groups (13.55±2.46 mmHg vs 14.82±2.86 mmHg, =0.014). In adjusted models, factors associated with overall dissatisfaction with glaucoma care included a pre-university education and above (odds ratio [OR] =8.06, 95% CI =1.57-41.27) and lower IOP (OR =0.83, 95% CI =0.71-0.98).

Conclusion: Although less than one tenth of glaucoma patients were dissatisfied with the overall glaucoma service, one in four patients were dissatisfied with three specific aspects of care. A lower IOP, ironically, and education level were associated with overall dissatisfaction. Improving patients' understanding of glaucoma test results, glaucoma complications, and disease management may increase patient satisfaction levels.

Citing Articles

Patients' Satisfaction with Topical Anti-Glaucoma Medications and Associated Factors at Gondar University Tertiary Eye Care and Training Center, Northwest Ethiopia, 2021.

Belie N, Ayele F, Mengist B, Alemayehu A, Assem A, Fekadu S Clin Optom (Auckl). 2023; 15:139-146.

PMID: 37361634 PMC: 10289171. DOI: 10.2147/OPTO.S411390.

Improving patient satisfaction in glaucoma care.

Islam S, Salha A, Azizi S Clin Ophthalmol. 2017; 11:2205-2206.

PMID: 29278241 PMC: 5731439. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S156129.

References

Hargraves J, Wilson I, Zaslavsky A, James C, Walker J, Rogers G . Adjusting for patient characteristics when analyzing reports from patients about hospital care. Med Care. 2001; 39(6):635-41. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200106000-00011. View

Sleath B, Robin A, Covert D, Byrd J, Tudor G, Svarstad B . Patient-reported behavior and problems in using glaucoma medications. Ophthalmology. 2006; 113(3):431-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.10.034. View

Williams B . Patient satisfaction: a valid concept?. Soc Sci Med. 1994; 38(4):509-16. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90247-x. View

Danesh-Meyer H, Deva N, Slight C, Tan Y, Tarr K, Carroll S . What do people with glaucoma know about their condition? A comparative cross-sectional incidence and prevalence survey. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008; 36(1):13-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2007.01624.x. View

Gray T, Fenerty C, Harper R, Lee A, Spencer A, Campbell M . Preliminary survey of educational support for patients prescribed ocular hypotensive therapy. Eye (Lond). 2010; 24(12):1777-86. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2010.121. View

Mansouri K, Iliev M, Rohrer K, Shaarawy T . Compliance and knowledge about glaucoma in patients at tertiary glaucoma units. Int Ophthalmol. 2011; 31(5):369-76. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-011-9468-2. View

Quigley H, Broman A . The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90(3):262-7. PMC: 1856963. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2005.081224. View

Ware Jr J, Snyder M, Wright W, Davies A . Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Eval Program Plann. 1982; 6(3-4):247-63. DOI: 10.1016/0149-7189(83)90005-8. View

Manary M, Boulding W, Staelin R, Glickman S . The patient experience and health outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2012; 368(3):201-3. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1211775. View

10.

Gebremedhn E, Chekol W, Amberbir W, Flatie T . Patient satisfaction with anaesthesia services and associated factors at the University of Gondar Hospital, 2013: a cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2015; 8:377. PMC: 4549915. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-015-1332-4. View

11.

Glen F, Baker H, Crabb D . A qualitative investigation into patients' views on visual field testing for glaucoma monitoring. BMJ Open. 2014; 4(1):e003996. PMC: 3902333. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003996. View

12.

Kerr N, Patel H, Chew S, Ali N, Eady E, Danesh-Meyer H . Patient satisfaction with topical ocular hypotensives. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012; 41(1):27-35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02823.x. View

13.

Ung C, Zhang E, Alfaro T, Murakami Y, Zhang M, Seider M . Glaucoma severity and medication adherence in a county hospital population. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120(6):1150-7. PMC: 3674151. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.11.026. View

14.

Birhanu Z, Assefa T, Woldie M, Morankar S . Determinants of satisfaction with health care provider interactions at health centres in central Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010; 10:78. PMC: 2848139. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-78. View

15.

Fan V, Reiber G, Diehr P, Burman M, McDonell M, Fihn S . Functional status and patient satisfaction: a comparison of ischemic heart disease, obstructive lung disease, and diabetes mellitus. J Gen Intern Med. 2005; 20(5):452-9. PMC: 1490111. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40057.x. View

16.

Redekop W, Koopmanschap M, Stolk R, Rutten G, Wolffenbuttel B, Niessen L . Health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction in Dutch patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25(3):458-63. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.25.3.458. View

17.

Peralta E, Muir K, Rosdahl J . Systematic Review of Knowledge Assessments for Glaucoma Patients. Semin Ophthalmol. 2016; 33(3):377-388. DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2016.1247180. View

18.

Hoevenaars J, Schouten J, van den Borne B, Beckers H, Webers C . Knowledge base and preferred methods of obtaining knowledge of glaucoma patients. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005; 15(1):32-40. DOI: 10.1177/112067210501500106. View

19.

Costa V, Spaeth G, Smith M, Uddoh C, Vasconcellos J, Kara-Jose N . Patient education in glaucoma: what do patients know about glaucoma?. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2007; 69(6):923-7. DOI: 10.1590/s0004-27492006000600024. View

20.

Petterson T, Lee P, Hollis S, Young B, Newton P, Dornan T . Well-being and treatment satisfaction in older people with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1998; 21(6):930-5. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.21.6.930. View