» Articles » PMID: 29070646

Amyloid-PET Burden and Regional Distribution in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Biomarker Performance

Overview
Date 2017 Oct 27
PMID 29070646
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: We performed a meta-analysis to synthesise current evidence on amyloid-positron emission tomography (PET) burden and presumed preferential occipital distribution in sporadic cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA).

Methods: In a PubMed systematic search, we identified case-control studies with extractable data on global and occipital-to-global amyloid-PET uptake in symptomatic patients with CAA (per Boston criteria) versus control groups (healthy participants or patients with non-CAA deep intracerebral haemorrhage) and patients with Alzheimer's disease. To circumvent PET studies' methodological variation, we generated and used 'fold change', that is, ratio of mean amyloid uptake (global and occipital-to-global) of CAA relative to comparison groups. Amyloid-PET uptake biomarker performance was then quantified by random-effects meta-analysis on the ratios of the means. A ratio >1 indicates that amyloid-PET uptake (global or occipital/global) is higher in CAA than comparison groups, and a ratio <1 indicates the reverse.

Results: Seven studies, including 106 patients with CAA (>90% with probable CAA) and 138 controls (96 healthy elderly, 42 deep intracerebral haemorrhage controls) and 72 patients with Alzheimer's disease, were included. Global amyloid-PET ratio between patients with CAA and controls was above 1, with an average effect size of 1.18 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.28; p<0.0001). Occipital-to-global amyloid-PET uptake ratio did not differ between patients with CAA versus patients with deep intracerebral haemorrhage or healthy controls. By contrast, occipital-to-global amyloid-PET uptake ratio was above 1 in patients with CAA versus those with Alzheimer's disease, with an average ratio of 1.10 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.19; p=0.009) and high statistical heterogeneity.

Conclusions: Our analysis provides exploratory actionable data on the overall effect sizes and strength of amyloid-PET burden and distribution in patients with CAA, useful for future larger studies.

Citing Articles

Differentiating Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy From Alzheimer's Disease Using Dual Amyloid and Tau Positron Emission Tomography.

Tsai H, Pasi M, Liu C, Tsai Y, Yen R, Chen Y J Stroke. 2025; 27(1):65-74.

PMID: 39916455 PMC: 11834354. DOI: 10.5853/jos.2024.02376.


Updated imaging markers in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: What radiologists need to know.

Tanaka F, Maeda M, Kishi S, Kogue R, Umino M, Ishikawa H Jpn J Radiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39730931 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-024-01720-2.


Centiloid recommendations for clinical context-of-use from the AMYPAD consortium.

Collij L, Bollack A, La Joie R, Shekari M, Bullich S, Roe-Vellve N Alzheimers Dement. 2024; 20(12):9037-9048.

PMID: 39564918 PMC: 11667534. DOI: 10.1002/alz.14336.


Subthreshold amyloid deposition, cerebral small vessel disease, and functional brain network disruption in delayed cognitive decline after stroke.

Lim J, Lee J, Kim G, Kim H, Shin D, Lee K Front Aging Neurosci. 2024; 16:1430408.

PMID: 39351012 PMC: 11439663. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1430408.


The Association Between Positive Amyloid-PET and Cognitive Decline Is Not Always Supportive of Alzheimer's Disease: Suggestions from a Case Report.

Lombardi G, Berti V, Ginestroni A, Nacmias B, Sorbi S J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2024; 8(1):281-288.

PMID: 38405347 PMC: 10894606. DOI: 10.3233/ADR-230183.