» Articles » PMID: 29067192

Comparative Efficacy of Tulathromycin and Tildipirosin for the Treatment of Experimental Infection in Calves

Overview
Journal Vet Med Sci
Date 2017 Oct 26
PMID 29067192
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this negative controlled, blinded, randomised, parallel group study was to compare the efficacy of two injectable macrolide antimicrobials, tulathromycin and tildipirosin, administered by single subcutaneous injection at dose rates of 2.5 and 4.0 mg kg bodyweight, respectively, in the treatment of an experimentally induced infection in calves. A total of 238 negative calves were challenged on three consecutive days with by endobronchial deposition. Post-challenge, a total of 126 animals fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were randomly allocated to three treatment groups: tulathromycin, tildipirosin and saline. Clinical observations for signs of respiratory disease and injection site assessments were conducted daily for 14 days post-treatment. The animals were then killed, the lungs were examined for evidence of lesions, and samples collected for bacterial isolation. Calves treated with tulathromycin had a lower percentage of lung with lesions (=0.0079), lower mortality (=0.0477), fewer days with depressed demeanour (=0.0486) and higher body weight (=0.0112) than calves administered tildipirosin.

Citing Articles

Pharmacokinetics of Tildipirosin in Plasma, Milk, and Somatic Cells Following Intravenous, Intramuscular, and Subcutaneous Administration in Dairy Goats.

Galecio J, Marin P, Hernandis V, Botia M, Escudero E Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14(4).

PMID: 35456694 PMC: 9031826. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14040860.


Case Study: Control of respiratory disease in male Holstein calves with tildipirosin and effect on health and growth from 0 to 4 months of age.

Hill T, Quigley J, Suarez-Mena F, Dennis T, Schlotterbeck R Prof Anim Sci. 2020; 34(1):118-123.

PMID: 32288482 PMC: 7147642. DOI: 10.15232/pas.2017-01694.


Effects of Tilmicosin Treatment on the Nasopharyngeal Microbiota of Feedlot Cattle With Respiratory Disease During the First Week of Clinical Recovery.

Zeineldin M, Lowe J, Aldridge B Front Vet Sci. 2020; 7:115.

PMID: 32185189 PMC: 7059195. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00115.


Distribution of Medically Relevant Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Mobile Genetic Elements in Soils of Temperate Forests and Grasslands Varying in Land Use.

Willms I, Yuan J, Penone C, Goldmann K, Vogt J, Wubet T Genes (Basel). 2020; 11(2).

PMID: 32019196 PMC: 7073645. DOI: 10.3390/genes11020150.


Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Tildipirosin Against in a Murine Lung Infection Model.

Zeng D, Sun M, Lin Z, Li M, Gehring R, Zeng Z Front Microbiol. 2018; 9:1038.

PMID: 29867911 PMC: 5968193. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01038.


References
1.
Godinho K, Rae A, Windsor G, Tilt N, Rowan T, Sunderland S . Efficacy of tulathromycin in the treatment of bovine respiratory disease associated with induced Mycoplasma bovis infections in young dairy calves. Vet Ther. 2005; 6(2):96-112. View

2.
Villarino N, Brown S, Martin-Jimenez T . Understanding the pharmacokinetics of tulathromycin: a pulmonary perspective. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2013; 37(3):211-21. DOI: 10.1111/jvp.12080. View

3.
Tanner A, Wu C . Adaptation of the Sensititre broth microdilution technique to antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Avian Dis. 1992; 36(3):714-7. View

4.
Maunsell F, Donovan G, Risco C, Brown M . Field evaluation of a Mycoplasma bovis bacterin in young dairy calves. Vaccine. 2009; 27(21):2781-8. PMC: 7115402. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.02.100. View

5.
Maunsell F, Woolums A, Francoz D, Rosenbusch R, Step D, Wilson D . Mycoplasma bovis infections in cattle. J Vet Intern Med. 2011; 25(4):772-83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2011.0750.x. View