» Articles » PMID: 29064040

A Systematic Review of Prognostic Factors Predicting Survival in Patients with Spinal Bone Metastases

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2017 Oct 25
PMID 29064040
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: For the selection of treatment in patients with spinal bone metastases (SBM), survival estimation plays a crucial role to avoid over- and under-treatment. To aid clinicians in this difficult task, several prediction models have been developed, consisting of many different risk factors. The aim of this systematic review was to identify prognostic factors that are associated with survival in patients with SBM to support development of predictive models.

Methods: A systematic review was performed with focus on prognostic factors associated with survival in patients with SBM. Two reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion and assessed the risk of bias. A level of evidence synthesis was performed for each prognostic factor. Inter-observer agreement for the risk of bias assessment was determined by the kappa-statistic.

Results: After screening, 142 full-text articles were obtained, of which 22 met the eligibility criteria. A total of 43 different prognostic factors were investigated in the included studies, of which 17 were relevant to pre-treatment survival estimation. The prognostic factors most frequently associated with survival were the primary tumor and the performance status. The prognostic factors most frequently not associated with survival were age, gender, number and location of the SBM and the presence of a pathologic fracture.

Conclusions: Prognostication for patients with SBM should be based on an accurate primary tumor classification, combined with a performance score. The benefit of adding other prognostic factors is doubtful.

Citing Articles

Fixing the Leaky Pipe: How to Improve the Uptake of Patient-Reported Outcomes-Based Prognostic and Predictive Models in Cancer Clinical Practice.

Spencer K, Absolom K, Allsop M, Relton S, Pearce J, Liao K JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023; 7:e2300070.

PMID: 37976441 PMC: 10681558. DOI: 10.1200/CCI.23.00070.


Outcomes and Complications of Surgery for Symptomatic Spinal Metastases; a Comparison Between Patients Aged ≥ 70 and <70.

Tan J, Hallinan J, Ang S, Tan T, Tan H, Tan L Global Spine J. 2023; 15(2):731-741.

PMID: 37880960 PMC: 11877557. DOI: 10.1177/21925682231209624.


The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is independently associated with 90-day and 12-month mortality after metastatic spinal tumor surgery.

De La Garza Ramos R, Ryvlin J, Hamad M, Fourman M, Eleswarapu A, Gelfand Y Eur Spine J. 2023; 32(12):4328-4334.

PMID: 37700182 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07930-y.


Establishing the Swiss Spinal Tumor Registry (Swiss-STR): a prospective observation of surgical treatment patterns and long-term outcomes in patients with primary and metastatic spinal tumors.

Nevzati E, Poletti N, Spiessberger A, Babler S, Studer G, Riklin C Front Surg. 2023; 10:1222595.

PMID: 37576924 PMC: 10416635. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1222595.


Predicting Survival in Patients Presenting With Spinal Epidural Metastases: The Limburg Spinal Metastasis Score.

Bulthuis V, Schuermans V, Willems P, Curfs I, Ramos Gonzalez A, van Kuijk S Int J Spine Surg. 2023; 17(4):547-556.

PMID: 37085320 PMC: 10478688. DOI: 10.14444/8473.


References
1.
Ariens G, van Mechelen W, Bongers P, Bouter L, van der Wal G . Physical risk factors for neck pain. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2000; 26(1):7-19. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.504. View

2.
Bach F, Larsen B, Rohde K, Borgesen S, Gjerris F, Agerlin N . Metastatic spinal cord compression. Occurrence, symptoms, clinical presentations and prognosis in 398 patients with spinal cord compression. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1990; 107(1-2):37-43. DOI: 10.1007/BF01402610. View

3.
Kataoka M, Kunisada T, Tanaka M, Takeda K, Itani S, Sugimoto Y . Statistical analysis of prognostic factors for survival in patients with spinal metastasis. Acta Med Okayama. 2012; 66(3):213-9. DOI: 10.18926/AMO/48560. View

4.
Park J, Rhim S, Jeon S . Efficacy of decompression and fixation for metastatic spinal cord compression: analysis of factors prognostic for survival and postoperative ambulation. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2012; 50(5):434-40. PMC: 3259463. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2011.50.5.434. View

5.
Arrigo R, Kalanithi P, Cheng I, Alamin T, Carragee E, Mindea S . Predictors of survival after surgical treatment of spinal metastasis. Neurosurgery. 2011; 68(3):674-81. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318207780c. View