» Articles » PMID: 29063229

Interfacing with the Nervous System: a Review of Current Bioelectric Technologies

Overview
Journal Neurosurg Rev
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 2017 Oct 25
PMID 29063229
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study is to discuss the state of the art with regard to established or promising bioelectric therapies meant to alter or control neurologic function. We present recent reports on bioelectric technologies that interface with the nervous system at three potential sites-(1) the end organ, (2) the peripheral nervous system, and (3) the central nervous system-while exploring practical and clinical considerations. A literature search was executed on PubMed, IEEE, and Web of Science databases. A review of the current literature was conducted to examine functional and histomorphological effects of neuroprosthetic interfaces with a focus on end-organ, peripheral, and central nervous system interfaces. Innovations in bioelectric technologies are providing increasing selectivity in stimulating distinct nerve fiber populations in order to activate discrete muscles. Significant advances in electrode array design focus on increasing selectivity, stability, and functionality of implantable neuroprosthetics. The application of neuroprosthetics to paretic nerves or even directly stimulating or recording from the central nervous system holds great potential in advancing the field of nerve and tissue bioelectric engineering and contributing to clinical care. Although current physiotherapeutic and surgical treatments seek to restore function, structure, or comfort, they bear significant limitations in enabling cosmetic or functional recovery. Instead, the introduction of bioelectric technology may play a role in the restoration of function in patients with neurologic deficits.

Citing Articles

Biomimetic Exogenous "Tissue Batteries" as Artificial Power Sources for Implantable Bioelectronic Devices Manufacturing.

Yue O, Wang X, Xie L, Bai Z, Zou X, Liu X Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 11(11):e2307369.

PMID: 38196276 PMC: 10953594. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202307369.


Highly conformable chip-in-foil implants for neural applications.

Stieglitz T, Gueli C, Martens J, Floto N, Eickenscheidt M, Sporer M Microsyst Nanoeng. 2023; 9:54.

PMID: 37180455 PMC: 10167239. DOI: 10.1038/s41378-023-00527-x.


Accelerating cutaneous healing in a rodent model of type II diabetes utilizing non-invasive focused ultrasound targeted at the spleen.

Morton C, Cotero V, Ashe J, Ginty F, Puleo C Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:1039960.

PMID: 36478877 PMC: 9721138. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1039960.


A bioresorbable peripheral nerve stimulator for electronic pain block.

Lee G, Ray E, Yoon H, Genovese S, Choi Y, Lee M Sci Adv. 2022; 8(40):eabp9169.

PMID: 36197971 PMC: 9534494. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abp9169.


Optimization of Surface Electromyography-Based Neurofeedback Rehabilitation Intervention System.

Sun W, Qi Y, Sun Y, Zhao T, Su X, Liu Y J Healthc Eng. 2021; 2021:5546716.

PMID: 33815729 PMC: 7990534. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5546716.

References
1.
Rousche P, Normann R . Chronic recording capability of the Utah Intracortical Electrode Array in cat sensory cortex. J Neurosci Methods. 1999; 82(1):1-15. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0270(98)00031-4. View

2.
Struijk J, Thomsen M, Larsen J, Sinkjaer T . Cuff electrodes for long-term recording of natural sensory information. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 1999; 18(3):91-8. DOI: 10.1109/51.765194. View

3.
Andreasen L, Struijk J, Lawrence S . Measurement of the performance of nerve cuff electrodes for recording. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2000; 38(4):447-53. DOI: 10.1007/BF02345015. View

4.
Schwartz A, Bennett M, Smith P, De Backer W, Hedner J, Boudewyns A . Therapeutic electrical stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve in obstructive sleep apnea. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001; 127(10):1216-23. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.127.10.1216. View

5.
Sackeim H, Rush A, George M, Marangell L, Husain M, Nahas Z . Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for treatment-resistant depression: efficacy, side effects, and predictors of outcome. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001; 25(5):713-28. DOI: 10.1016/S0893-133X(01)00271-8. View