» Articles » PMID: 29062243

Frequency-domain Optical Tomographic Image Reconstruction Algorithm with the Simplified Spherical Harmonics (SP) Light Propagation Model

Overview
Journal Int J Therm Sci
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2017 Oct 25
PMID 29062243
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We introduce here the finite volume formulation of the frequency-domain simplified spherical harmonics model with -th order absorption coefficients (FD-SP) that approximates the frequency-domain equation of radiative transfer (FD-ERT). We then present the FD-SP based reconstruction algorithm that recovers absorption and scattering coefficients in biological tissue. The FD-SP model with 3 order absorption coefficient (i.e., FD-SP) is used as a forward model to solve the inverse problem. The FD-SP is discretized with a node-centered finite volume scheme and solved with a restarted generalized minimum residual (GMRES) algorithm. The absorption and scattering coefficients are retrieved using a limited-memory Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (L-BFGS) algorithm. Finally, the forward and inverse algorithms are evaluated using numerical phantoms with optical properties and size that mimic small-volume tissue such as finger joints and small animals. The forward results show that the FD-SP model approximates the FD-ERT (S) solution within relatively high accuracy; the average error in the phase (<3.7%) and the amplitude (<7.1%) of the partial current at the boundary are reported. From the inverse results we find that the absorption and scattering coefficient maps are more accurately reconstructed with the SP model than those with the SP model. Therefore, this work shows that the FD-SP is an efficient model for optical tomographic imaging of small-volume media with non-diffuse properties both in terms of computational time and accuracy as it requires significantly lower CPU time than the FD-ERT (S) and also it is more accurate than the FD-SP.

Citing Articles

Unrolled-DOT: an interpretable deep network for diffuse optical tomography.

Zhao Y, Raghuram A, Wang F, Kim S, Hielscher A, Robinson J J Biomed Opt. 2023; 28(3):036002.

PMID: 36908760 PMC: 9995139. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.28.3.036002.


Ultrafast and Ultrahigh-Resolution Diffuse Optical Tomography for Brain Imaging with Sensitivity Equation based Noniterative Sparse Optical Reconstruction (SENSOR).

Kim H, Zhao Y, Raghuram A, Veeraraghavan A, Robinson J, Hielscher A J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf. 2021; 276.

PMID: 34966190 PMC: 8713562. DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107939.


High Resolution, Deep Imaging Using Confocal Time-of-Flight Diffuse Optical Tomography.

Zhao Y, Raghuram A, Kim H, Hielscher A, Robinson J, Veeraraghavan A IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2021; 43(7):2206-2219.

PMID: 33891548 PMC: 8270678. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3075366.

References
1.
Montejo L, Jia J, Kim H, Netz U, Blaschke S, Muller G . Computer-aided diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis with optical tomography, Part 2: image classification. J Biomed Opt. 2013; 18(7):076002. PMC: 3710916. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.18.7.076002. View

2.
Montejo L, Jia J, Kim H, Netz U, Blaschke S, Muller G . Computer-aided diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis with optical tomography, Part 1: feature extraction. J Biomed Opt. 2013; 18(7):076001. PMC: 3710917. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.18.7.076001. View

3.
Arridge S, Cope M, Delpy D . The theoretical basis for the determination of optical pathlengths in tissue: temporal and frequency analysis. Phys Med Biol. 1992; 37(7):1531-60. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/37/7/005. View

4.
Hielscher A, Alcouffe R, Barbour R . Comparison of finite-difference transport and diffusion calculations for photon migration in homogeneous and heterogeneous tissues. Phys Med Biol. 1998; 43(5):1285-302. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/43/5/017. View

5.
Arridge S, Schweiger M, Hiraoka M, Delpy D . A finite element approach for modeling photon transport in tissue. Med Phys. 1993; 20(2 Pt 1):299-309. DOI: 10.1118/1.597069. View