» Articles » PMID: 29051825

Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Neonates: a Review

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Oct 21
PMID 29051825
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is well established in the management of diabetes mellitus, but its role in neonatal glycaemic control is less clear. CGM has provided important insights about neonatal glucose metabolism, and there is increasing interest in its clinical use, particularly in preterm neonates and in those in whom glucose control is difficult. Neonatal glucose instability, including hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia, has been associated with poorer neurodevelopment, and CGM offers the possibility of adjusting treatment in real time to account for individual metabolic requirements while reducing the number of blood tests required, potentially improving long-term outcomes. However, current devices are optimised for use at relatively high glucose concentrations, and several technical issues need to be resolved before real-time CGM can be recommended for routine neonatal care. These include: 1) limited point accuracy, especially at low or rapidly changing glucose concentrations; 2) calibration methods that are designed for higher glucose concentrations of children and adults, and not for neonates; 3) sensor drift, which is under-recognised; and 4) the need for dynamic and integrated metrics that can be related to long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. CGM remains an important tool for retrospective investigation of neonatal glycaemia and the effect of different treatments on glucose metabolism. However, at present CGM should be limited to research studies, and should only be introduced into routine clinical care once benefit is demonstrated in randomised trials.

Citing Articles

Insulin Delivery Technology for Treatment of Infants with Neonatal Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.

Panza R, Cattivera V, Colella J, Baldassarre M, Capozza M, Zagaroli L Diabetes Ther. 2024; 15(11):2293-2308.

PMID: 39292435 PMC: 11467148. DOI: 10.1007/s13300-024-01653-z.


Neonatal hypoglycaemia.

Harding J, Alsweiler J, Edwards T, McKinlay C BMJ Med. 2024; 3(1):e000544.

PMID: 38618170 PMC: 11015200. DOI: 10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000544.


Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Transient Neonatal Diabetes Mellitus-2 Case Reports and Literature Review.

Chisnoiu T, Balasa A, Mihai L, Lupu A, Frecus C, Ion I Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(13).

PMID: 37443665 PMC: 10340365. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13132271.


Hyperglycemia and prematurity: a narrative review.

Angelis D, Jaleel M, Brion L Pediatr Res. 2023; 94(3):892-903.

PMID: 37120652 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-023-02628-9.


Dilemmas in parenteral glucose delivery and approach to glucose monitoring and interpretation in the neonate.

Blanco C, Smith V, Ramel S, Martin C J Perinatol. 2023; 43(9):1200-1205.

PMID: 36964206 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-023-01640-5.


References
1.
Baumeister F, Rolinski B, Busch R, Emmrich P . Glucose monitoring with long-term subcutaneous microdialysis in neonates. Pediatrics. 2001; 108(5):1187-92. DOI: 10.1542/peds.108.5.1187. View

2.
Signal M, Le Compte A, Shaw G, Chase J . Glycemic levels in critically ill patients: are normoglycemia and low variability associated with improved outcomes?. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012; 6(5):1030-7. PMC: 3570836. DOI: 10.1177/193229681200600506. View

3.
Mizumoto H, Kawai M, Yamashita S, Hata D . Intraday glucose fluctuation is common in preterm infants receiving intermittent tube feeding. Pediatr Int. 2015; 58(5):359-62. DOI: 10.1111/ped.12838. View

4.
Diwakar K, Sasidhar M . Plasma glucose levels in term infants who are appropriate size for gestation and exclusively breast fed. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002; 87(1):F46-8. PMC: 1721420. DOI: 10.1136/fn.87.1.f46. View

5.
Oh W, Poindexter B, Perritt R, Lemons J, Bauer C, Ehrenkranz R . Association between fluid intake and weight loss during the first ten days of life and risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 2005; 147(6):786-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.06.039. View