» Articles » PMID: 29049405

Differences in Pupillary Light Reflex Between Optic Neuritis and Ischemic Optic Neuropathy

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 Oct 20
PMID 29049405
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To determine the differences in pupillary light reflex (PLR) between the acute and chronic phases of optic neuritis (ON) and nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION).

Methods: The study included 30 patients with ON and 22 patients with NAION whose PLR were measured by a dynamic pupillometer (PLR-200; NeurOptics Inc., Irvine, USA). Age-matched controls included 58 healthy individuals with normal vision and optic nerve function. Pupil diameters, latency, constriction ratio, constriction velocity and dilation velocity were noted. The differences in PLR measurements were compared among the acute and chronic phases of ON and NAION, and in age-matched controls. Regression analysis determined factors associated with PLR measurements, including visual acuity, color vision defect, visual field defects and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements on optical coherence tomography.

Results: Pupillary constriction velocity, constriction ratio and latency were all significantly decreased in the acute phase of ON and NAION. ON showed significantly delayed constriction latency compared to NAION (P = 0.047). Pupillary constriction velocity, constriction ratio and latency were recovered in the chronic phase of ON (P = 0.038, 0.018, and 0.045), however, these parameters were not recovered in NAION (P = 0.693, 0.173 and 0.994).

Conclusions: Pupillary constriction velocity, constriction ratio, and latency were significantly decreased in the acute phase of ON and NAION compared to normal controls. ON showed delayed constriction latency compared to NAION. Decreased PLR were recovered in the chronic phase of ON, but not in NAION.

Citing Articles

Mapping simulated visual field defects with movie-viewing pupil perimetry.

Cai Y, Strauch C, Van der Stigchel S, Ten Brink A, Cornelissen F, Naber M Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025; .

PMID: 39779511 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-024-06733-1.


Application of the international criteria for optic neuritis in the Acute Optic Neuritis Network.

Klyscz P, Asseyer S, Alonso R, Bereuter C, Bialer O, Bick A Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024; 11(9):2473-2484.

PMID: 39099240 PMC: 11537134. DOI: 10.1002/acn3.52166.


Basics, benefits, and pitfalls of pupillometers assessing visual function.

Philibert M, Milea D Eye (Lond). 2024; 38(12):2415-2421.

PMID: 38802485 PMC: 11306737. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-03151-9.


Influence of Sevoflurane on the Neurological Pupil Index in Surgical and Critically Ill Patients: A Pilot Study.

Dallemagne A, Anderloni M, Havaux M, Duranteau O, Taccone F Brain Sci. 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 38539621 PMC: 10968887. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14030232.


Dynamic Pupillary Response in Multiple Sclerosis Patients with and without Optic Neuritis.

Gil-Casas A, Pinero D, Molina-Martin A Biomedicines. 2023; 11(12).

PMID: 38137553 PMC: 10741580. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11123332.


References
1.
Bergamin O, Kardon R . Latency of the pupil light reflex: sample rate, stimulus intensity, and variation in normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44(4):1546-54. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-0468. View

2.
Du R, Meeker M, Bacchetti P, Larson M, Holland M, Manley G . Evaluation of the portable infrared pupillometer. Neurosurgery. 2005; 57(1):198-203. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000163425.79170.cb. View

3.
Hults K, Knowlton S, Oliver J, Wolfson T, Gamst A . A study of pupillary assessment in outpatient neurosurgical clinics. J Neurosci Nurs. 2007; 38(6):447-52. DOI: 10.1097/01376517-200612000-00010. View

4.
Chen J, Gombart Z, Rogers S, Gardiner S, Cecil S, Bullock R . Pupillary reactivity as an early indicator of increased intracranial pressure: The introduction of the Neurological Pupil index. Surg Neurol Int. 2011; 2:82. PMC: 3130361. DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.82248. View

5.
Peeler C, Cestari D . Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION): A Review and Update on Animal Models. Semin Ophthalmol. 2016; 31(1-2):99-106. DOI: 10.3109/08820538.2015.1115248. View