» Articles » PMID: 29043385

Whole-Gland Prostate Cancer Cryoablation with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guidance: One-Year Follow-Up

Abstract

Purpose: Patients who develop prostate cancer after prior abdominal perineal resection are poor surgical candidates, and have limited treatment options. Therefore, our goal is to present results from a single institutional experience of four patients who underwent whole gland MRI-guided cryoablation with a history complicated by prior abdominoperineal resection.

Materials And Methods: Four MRI-guided cryoablative treatments (mean age 64, range 59-69 years) for primary and locally recurrent prostate adenocarcinoma were retrospectively reviewed in patients with prior abdominal perineal resection for colorectal cancer (3) and juvenile polyposis (1). Average prostate volume prior to ablation was 23 cc, with an average PSA of 5.6 ng/mL. For each gland, 7-10 cryoprobes were placed approximately 0.5 cm apart in the prostate gland under MRI guidance by a transperineal approach with 3-4 freeze-thaw cycles performed. Each patient had follow up imaging and PSA measurements out to 12 months post ablation.

Results: All four patient's PSA dropped below 0.1 ng/mL at 3-6 month post-ablation and remained at these levels at 12 months. Three of the 4 patients had PSA measurements to 33 months post-ablation, with no evidence of recurrence. No patient developed urinary incontinence due to the whole gland cryoablation.

Conclusion: With all four patients in our study having undetectable PSAs 12 months post ablation, and with no patient developing urinary incontinence due to the cryoablation, MRI-guided cryoablation appears to be a promising treatment option in patients who are poor surgical candidates due to prior pelvic surgery and/or radiation.

Citing Articles

Advances in Image-Guided Ablation Therapies for Solid Tumors.

Campbell 4th W, Makary M Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(14).

PMID: 39061199 PMC: 11274819. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16142560.


Image-Guided Prostate Cryoablation: State-of-the-Art.

Ramalingam V, McCarthy C, Degerstedt S, Ahmed M Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(9).

PMID: 37763708 PMC: 10535457. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59091589.


MRI-Guided Salvage Focal Cryoablation: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience in 114 Patients with Localized Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Wimper Y, Overduin C, Sedelaar J, Veltman J, Jenniskens S, Bomers J Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(16).

PMID: 37627122 PMC: 10452144. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164093.


MR Imaging in Real Time Guiding of Therapies in Prostate Cancer.

Wimper Y, Futterer J, Bomers J Life (Basel). 2022; 12(2).

PMID: 35207589 PMC: 8878909. DOI: 10.3390/life12020302.


"Prostate management" under MRI-guidance: 7 years of improvements.

Tricard T, Garnon J, Cazzato R, Al Hashimi I, Gangi A, Lang H Transl Cancer Res. 2022; 9(4):2280-2286.

PMID: 35117588 PMC: 8798483. DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2020.03.44.


References
1.
Tuncali K, Morrison P, Tatli S, Silverman S . MRI-guided percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors: use of external manual displacement of adjacent bowel loops. Eur J Radiol. 2006; 59(2):198-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.04.013. View

2.
Tacke J, Adam G, Haage P, Sellhaus B, Grosskortenhaus S, Gunther R . MR-guided percutaneous cryotherapy of the liver: in vivo evaluation with histologic correlation in an animal model. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001; 13(1):50-6. DOI: 10.1002/1522-2586(200101)13:1<50::aid-jmri1008>3.0.co;2-a. View

3.
Eisenberg M, Shinohara K . Partial salvage cryoablation of the prostate for recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy failure. Urology. 2008; 72(6):1315-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.03.040. View

4.
Gotto G, Yunis L, Vora K, Eastham J, Scardino P, Rabbani F . Impact of prior prostate radiation on complications after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2010; 184(1):136-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.031. View

5.
Li Y, ElShafei A, Agarwal G, Ruckle H, Powsang J, Stephen Jones J . Salvage focal prostate cryoablation for locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy: initial results from the cryo on-line data registry. Prostate. 2014; 75(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1002/pros.22881. View