» Articles » PMID: 29040132

A Call for Standardization in Platelet-Rich Plasma Preparation Protocols and Composition Reporting: A Systematic Review of the Clinical Orthopaedic Literature

Overview
Date 2017 Oct 18
PMID 29040132
Citations 145
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a blood-derived preparation whose use has grown exponentially in orthopaedic practice. However, there remains an unclear understanding of the biological properties and effects of PRP on musculoskeletal healing. Heterogeneous processing methods, unstandardized nomenclature, and ambiguous classifications make comparison among studies challenging. A comprehensive assessment of orthopaedic clinical PRP trials is key to unraveling the biological complexity of PRP, while improving standardized communication. Toward this goal, we performed a systematic review of the PRP preparation protocols and PRP composition utilized in clinical trials for the treatment of musculoskeletal diseases.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed from 2006 to 2016. Inclusion criteria were human clinical trials, English-language literature, and manuscripts that reported on the use of PRP in musculoskeletal/orthopaedic conditions. Basic-science articles, editorials, surveys, special topics, letters to the editor, personal correspondence, and nonorthopaedic applications (including cosmetic use or dental application studies) were excluded.

Results: A total of 105 studies (in 104 articles) met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Of these studies, only 11 (10%) provided comprehensive reporting that included a clear description of the preparation protocol that could be used by subsequent investigators to repeat the method. Only 17 studies (16%) provided quantitative metrics on the composition of the final PRP product.

Conclusions: Reporting of PRP preparation protocols in clinical studies is highly inconsistent, and the majority of studies did not provide sufficient information to allow the protocol to be reproduced. Furthermore, the current reporting of PRP preparation and composition does not enable comparison of the PRP products being delivered to patients. A detailed, precise, and stepwise description of the PRP preparation protocol is required to allow comparison among studies and provide reproducibility.

Citing Articles

The Regenerative Marriage Between High-Density Platelet-Rich Plasma and Adipose Tissue.

Everts P, Podesta L, Lana J, Shapiro G, Domingues R, van Zundert A Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(5).

PMID: 40076775 PMC: 11900530. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26052154.


A Cross-Sectional Study: Dentists' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions of the Role of Plasma-Rich Protein and its Applications in Tooth Movement Rate.

Shaga I, Elangovan B, Acchuthakrishnan , Devika J, Anitha K, Moulvi S J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025; 16(Suppl 5):S4529-S4531.

PMID: 40061665 PMC: 11888662. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1145_24.


Demographic, anthropometric and intrasubject variations affect platelet-rich plasma formulation.

Garcia-Bordes L, Alvarez-Diaz P, Alentorn-Geli E, Ferre-Aniorte A, Laiz-Boada P, Seijas-Vazquez R J Exp Orthop. 2025; 12(1):e70024.

PMID: 39867676 PMC: 11764439. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70024.


The efficacy of core decompression combined with regenerative therapy in early femoral head necrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis involving 954 subjects.

Tang H, Ling T, Zhao E, You M, Chen X, Chen G Front Pharmacol. 2025; 15():1501590.

PMID: 39840080 PMC: 11747542. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1501590.


Two-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reduces failure risk but leads to lesser clinical outcomes than single-stage revision after primary anterior cruciate ligament graft failure: a retrospective cohort study.

Ifarraguerri A, Graham G, White A, Berk A, Gachigi K, Siparsky P Knee Surg Relat Res. 2025; 37(1):5.

PMID: 39815325 PMC: 11734444. DOI: 10.1186/s43019-024-00257-y.