» Articles » PMID: 29037234

Women's Attitudes, Experiences and Compliance Concerning the Use of Mindfetalness- a Method for Systematic Observation of Fetal Movements in Late Pregnancy

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Oct 18
PMID 29037234
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Maternal perception of decreased fetal movements and low awareness of fetal movements are associated with a negative birth outcome. Mindfetalness is a method developed for women to facilitate systematic observations of the intensity, character and frequency of fetal movements in late pregnancy. We sought to explore women's attitudes, experiences and compliance in using Mindfetalness.

Methods: We enrolled 104 pregnant women treated at three maternity clinics in Stockholm, Sweden, from February to July of 2016. We educated 104 women in gestational week 28-32 by providing information about fetal movements and how to practice Mindfetalness. Each was instructed to perform the assessment daily for 15 min. At each subsequent follow-up, the midwife collected information regarding their perceptions of Mindfetalness, and their compliance. Content analyses, descriptive and analytic statistics were used in the analysis of data.

Results: Of the women, 93 (89%) were positive towards Mindfetalness and compliance was high 78 (75%). Subjective responses could be binned into one of five categories: Decreased worry, relaxing, creating a relationship, more knowledge about the unborn baby and awareness of the unborn baby. Eleven (11%) women had negative perceptions of Mindfetalness, citing time, and the lack of need for a method to observe fetal movements as the most common reasons.

Conclusion: Women in late pregnancy are generally positive about Mindfetalness and their compliance with daily use is high. The technique helped them to be more aware of, and create a relationship with, their unborn baby. Mindfetalness can be a useful tool in antenatal care. However, further study is necessary in order to determine whether the technique is able to reduce the incidence of negative birth outcome.

Citing Articles

Country of birth, educational level and other predictors of seeking care due to decreased fetal movements: an observational study in Sweden using data from a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Radestad I, Pettersson K, Lindgren H, Skokic V, Akselsson A BMJ Open. 2021; 11(6):e050621.

PMID: 34172554 PMC: 8237734. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050621.


Assessing fetal movements in pregnancy: A qualitative evidence synthesis of women's views, perspectives and experiences.

Smith V, Muldoon K, Brady V, Delaney H BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021; 21(1):197.

PMID: 33691666 PMC: 7944914. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03667-y.


A decrease in cesarean sections and labor inductions among Swedish women by awareness of fetal movements with the Mindfetalness method.

Akselsson A, Lindgren H, Skokic V, Radestad I BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20(1):577.

PMID: 32998708 PMC: 7528254. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-03268-1.


Pregnancy outcomes among women born in Somalia and Sweden giving birth in the Stockholm area - a population-based study.

Akselsson A, Lindgren H, Georgsson S, Pettersson K, Skokic V, Radestad I Glob Health Action. 2020; 13(1):1794107.

PMID: 32744184 PMC: 7480426. DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1794107.

References
1.
Grimes H, Forster D, Newton M . Sources of information used by women during pregnancy to meet their information needs. Midwifery. 2013; 30(1):e26-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.10.007. View

2.
Raynes-Greenow C, Gordon A, Li Q, Hyett J . A cross-sectional study of maternal perception of fetal movements and antenatal advice in a general pregnant population, using a qualitative framework. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013; 13:32. PMC: 3572429. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-32. View

3.
McArdle A, Flenady V, Toohill J, Gamble J, Creedy D . How pregnant women learn about foetal movements: sources and preferences for information. Women Birth. 2014; 28(1):54-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2014.10.002. View

4.
Saastad E, Winje B, Israel P, Froen J . Fetal movement counting--maternal concern and experiences: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Birth. 2012; 39(1):10-20. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2011.00508.x. View

5.
Christensen F, Olson K, Rayburn W . Cross-over trial comparing maternal acceptance of two fetal movement charts. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003; 14(2):118-22. DOI: 10.1080/jmf.14.2.118.122. View