» Articles » PMID: 29036209

Understanding Differences in Conception and Abortion Rates Among Under-20 Year Olds in Britain and France: Examining the Contribution of Social Disadvantage

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 Oct 17
PMID 29036209
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Socioeconomic status has been shown to be associated with sexual activity, contraceptive-use, pregnancy and abortion among young people. Less is known about whether the strength of the association differs for each outcome, between men and women, or cross-nationally. We investigate this using contemporaneous national probability survey data from Britain and France.

Methods: Data were analysed for 17-29 year-olds in Britain's third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3, n = 5959) undertaken 2010-2012, and the 2010 French Fertility, Contraception and Sexual Dysfunction survey (FECOND, n = 3027). For each country, we estimated the gender-specific prevalence of sex before-16, contraceptive-use, conception before-20, and abortion in the event of conception, and used logistic regression to examine associations between two measures of socioeconomic status-educational-level and parental socioeconomic-group-and each outcome. We tested for interactions between socioeconomic characteristics and country, and socioeconomic characteristics and gender, for each outcome.

Results: For each outcome, Britain and France differed with regard to prevalence but associations with socioeconomic characteristics were similar. Respondents of higher educational level, and, less consistently, with parents from higher socioeconomic-groups, were less likely to report sex before-16 (Britain, men: adjusted OR (aOR) 0.5, women: aOR 0.5; France, men: aOR 0.5, women: aOR 0.5), no contraception at first sex (Britain, men: aOR 0.4, women: aOR 0.6; France, men: aOR 0.4, women: aOR 0.4), pregnancy before-20 (Britain: aOR 0.3; France: aOR 0.1), and in Britain, a birth rather than an abortion in the event of conception (Britain: aOR 3.1). We found no strong evidence of variation in the magnitude of the associations with socioeconomic characteristics by country or gender.

Conclusions: Population level differences in conception and abortion rates between the two countries may partly be driven by the larger proportion of the population that is disadvantaged in Britain. This research highlights the role intra-country comparisons can play in understanding young people's sexual and reproductive behaviours.

Citing Articles

Project20: Does continuity of care and community-based antenatal care improve maternal and neonatal birth outcomes for women with social risk factors? A prospective, observational study.

Rayment-Jones H, Dalrymple K, Harris J, Harden A, Parslow E, Georgi T PLoS One. 2021; 16(5):e0250947.

PMID: 33945565 PMC: 8096106. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250947.


Adolescent Sexual Activity, Contraceptive Use, and Pregnancy in Britain and the U.S.: A Multidecade Comparison.

Scott R, Wellings K, Lindberg L J Adolesc Health. 2020; 66(5):582-588.

PMID: 32029341 PMC: 7181173. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.11.310.

References
1.
Sedgh G, Finer L, Bankole A, Eilers M, Singh S . Adolescent pregnancy, birth, and abortion rates across countries: levels and recent trends. J Adolesc Health. 2015; 56(2):223-30. PMC: 4852976. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.09.007. View

2.
Rossier C, Michelot F, Bajos N . Modeling the process leading to abortion: an application to French survey data. Stud Fam Plann. 2007; 38(3):163-72. DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2007.00128.x. View

3.
Hall K, Moreau C, Trussell J, Barber J . Role of young women's depression and stress symptoms in their weekly use and nonuse of contraceptive methods. J Adolesc Health. 2013; 53(2):241-8. PMC: 3713141. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.009. View

4.
Bonell C, Strange V, Stephenson J, Oakley A, Copas A, Forrest S . Effect of social exclusion on the risk of teenage pregnancy: development of hypotheses using baseline data from a randomised trial of sex education. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003; 57(11):871-6. PMC: 1732333. DOI: 10.1136/jech.57.11.871. View

5.
Kneale D, Fletcher A, Wiggins R, Bonell C . Distribution and determinants of risk of teenage motherhood in three British longitudinal studies: implications for targeted prevention interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012; 67(1):48-55. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2011-200867. View