» Articles » PMID: 29033810

Cooperation and Competition with Hyperscanning Methods: Review and Future Application to Emotion Domain

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2017 Oct 17
PMID 29033810
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cooperation and competition, as two common and opposite examples of interpersonal dynamics, are thought to be reflected by different cognitive, neural, and behavioral patterns. According to the conventional approach, they have been explored by measuring subjects' reactions during individual performance or turn-based interactions in artificial settings, that don't allow on-line, ecological enactment of real-life social exchange. Considering the importance of these factors, and accounting for the complexity of such phenomena, the hyperscanning approach emerged as a multi-subject paradigm since it allows the simultaneous recording of the brain activity from multiple participants interacting. In this view, the present paper aimed at reviewing the most significant work about cooperation and competition by EEG hyperscanning technique, which proved to be a promising tool in capturing the sudden course of social interactions. In detail, the review will consider and group different experimental tasks that have been developed so far: (1) paradigms that used rhythm, music and motor synchronization; (2) card tasks taken from the Game Theory; (3) computerized tasks; and (4) possible real-life applications. Finally, although highlighting the potential contribution of such approach, some important limitations about these paradigms will be elucidated, with a specific focus on the emotional domain.

Citing Articles

Exploring the neural mechanisms underlying cooperation and competition behavior: Insights from stereo-electroencephalography hyperscanning.

Qiao X, Li R, Huang H, Hong Y, Li X, Li Z iScience. 2025; 28(2):111506.

PMID: 39898025 PMC: 11787601. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111506.


Brain-to-brain coupling forecasts future joint action outcomes.

Markiewicz R, Segaert K, Mazaheri A iScience. 2024; 27(9):110802.

PMID: 39290842 PMC: 11407023. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110802.


Does emotional valence affect cognitive performance and neurophysiological response during decision making? A preliminary study.

Balconi M, Rovelli K Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1408526.

PMID: 39184323 PMC: 11341406. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1408526.


How Socially Avoidant Emerging Adults Process Social Feedback during Human-to-Human Interaction after Social Rejection: An Event-Related Potential Study.

Chen Y, Deng X Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38920789 PMC: 11200703. DOI: 10.3390/bs14060457.


Implementation of a Real-Time Brain-to-Brain Synchrony Estimation Algorithm for Neuroeducation Applications.

Mendoza-Armenta A, Blanco-Tellez P, Garcia-Alcantar A, Ceballos-Gonzalez I, Hernandez-Mustieles M, Ramirez-Mendoza R Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(6).

PMID: 38544039 PMC: 10974269. DOI: 10.3390/s24061776.


References
1.
Astolfi L, Cincotti F, Mattia D, De Vico Fallani F, Salinari S, Vecchiato G . Simultaneous estimation of cortical activity during social interactions by using EEG hyperscannings. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010; 2010:2814-7. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5626555. View

2.
Coan J, Schaefer H, Davidson R . Lending a hand: social regulation of the neural response to threat. Psychol Sci. 2007; 17(12):1032-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01832.x. View

3.
Schilbach L . A second-person approach to other minds. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010; 11(6):449. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2805-c1. View

4.
King-Casas B, Tomlin D, Anen C, Camerer C, Quartz S, Montague P . Getting to know you: reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange. Science. 2005; 308(5718):78-83. DOI: 10.1126/science.1108062. View

5.
Babiloni F, Astolfi L . Social neuroscience and hyperscanning techniques: past, present and future. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012; 44:76-93. PMC: 3522775. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.07.006. View