» Articles » PMID: 29030886

Genetics of Acute Rejection After Kidney Transplantation

Overview
Journal Transpl Int
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2017 Oct 15
PMID 29030886
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Treatment of acute rejection (AR) following kidney transplantation has improved in recent years, but there are still limitations to successful outcomes. This review article covers literature in regard to recipient and donor genetics of AR kidney and secondarily of liver allografts. Many candidate gene and some genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been conducted for AR in kidney transplantation. Genetic associations with AR in kidney and liver are mostly weak, and in most cases, the associations have not been reproducible. A limitation in the study of AR is the lack of sufficiently large populations that account for population stratification to study the AR phenotype which in this era occurs in <10% of transplants. Furthermore, the AR phenotype has been difficult to define and the definitions of classifications have evolved over time. Literature related to the pharmacogenomics of tacrolimus is robust and has been validated in many studies. Associations between gene expression and AR are emerging as markers of outcomes and AR classification. In the future, combinations of pretransplant genotype for AR risk prediction, genotype-based immune suppressant dosing, and pharmacogenomic markers to select AR maintenance or treatment and expression markers from biopsies may provide valuable clinical tools for guiding treatment.

Citing Articles

CAV1 promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and chronic renal allograft interstitial fibrosis by activating the ferroptosis pathway.

Han Q, Ni B, Bao W, Zhang J, Zheng M, Miu J Front Immunol. 2025; 16:1523855.

PMID: 40013149 PMC: 11860899. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1523855.


Racial Disparities in Hospitalization Rates During Long-Term Follow-Up After Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplantation.

Islam S, Zhang D, Ho K, Divers J J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023; 12(1):32-40.

PMID: 37930581 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-023-01847-4.


Biomarkers for Kidney-Transplant Rejection: A Short Review Study.

Sharaby I, Alksas A, Abou El-Ghar M, Eldeeb M, Ghazal M, Gondim D Biomedicines. 2023; 11(9).

PMID: 37760879 PMC: 10525551. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11092437.


Pathophysiology of Rejection in Kidney Transplantation.

Tamargo C, Kant S J Clin Med. 2023; 12(12).

PMID: 37373823 PMC: 10299312. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12124130.


Genome-wide association study biomarkers in T-cell mediated rejection: selective effect according to the Banff classification.

Santiago J, Sanchez-Perez L, Perez-Flores I, Moreno de la Higuera M, Calvo Romero N, Urcelay E J Nephrol. 2022; 36(3):809-815.

PMID: 35947357 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-022-01419-5.


References
1.
Park J, Park M, Park H, Ha J, Kim S, Ahn C . TNF-alpha and TGF-beta1 gene polymorphisms and renal allograft rejection in Koreans. Tissue Antigens. 2004; 64(6):660-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.2004.00330.x. View

2.
Kim S, Park H, Seok H, Jeon H, Lee T, Lee S . Association studies of cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily E, polypeptide 1 (CYP2E1) gene polymorphisms with acute rejection in kidney transplantation recipients. Clin Transplant. 2014; 28(6):707-12. DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12369. View

3.
Suarez-Kurtz G, Vargens D, Santoro A, Hutz M, de Moraes M, Pena S . Global pharmacogenomics: distribution of CYP3A5 polymorphisms and phenotypes in the Brazilian population. PLoS One. 2014; 9(1):e83472. PMC: 3888384. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083472. View

4.
Mengel M, Reeve J, Bunnag S, Einecke G, Jhangri G, Sis B . Scoring total inflammation is superior to the current Banff inflammation score in predicting outcome and the degree of molecular disturbance in renal allografts. Am J Transplant. 2009; 9(8):1859-67. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02727.x. View

5.
Pazik J, Oldak M, Dabrowski M, Lewandowski Z, Sitarek E, PodgOrska M . Association of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A9 (UGT1A9) gene polymorphism with kidney allograft function. Ann Transplant. 2012; 16(4):69-73. DOI: 10.12659/aot.882221. View